Civil Aviation Act 1978 (repealed 8.11.1995)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
14 Minor, consequential and consolidation amendments and repeals.
(1) The enactments specified in Schedule 1 to this Act shall have effect subject to the amendments there specified, and of those amendments— (a) those specified in Part I of that Schedule are minor amendments and amendments consequential on the provisions of this Act; . . . (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) The enactments specified in Schedule 2 to this Act (which include certain spent provisions) are hereby repealed to the extent specified in the third column of that Schedule. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14 Minor, consequential and consolidation amendments and repeals.
(1) The enactments specified in Schedule 1 to this Act shall have effect subject to the amendments there specified, and of those amendments— (a) those specified in Part I of that Schedule are minor amendments and amendments consequential on the provisions of this Act; . . . (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) The enactments specified in Schedule 2 to this Act (which include certain spent provisions) are hereby repealed to the extent specified in the third column of that Schedule. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.