Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
98 Failure to provide information under article 73
(1) The administrator may impose the penalties in paragraph (2) where a participant in the Trading Schemes fails to comply with a requirement in article 73 to provide, or to ensure that the administrator has available to it, the information or evidence specified in—
(a) article 73(5)(a) to (d) (SPVs, car clubs and ZE car or van warranties);
(b) paragraph 1(g), 6(g)12(c) or 13(c) of Schedule 7 (specific emissions of CO2 of a car, van or SPV);
(c) paragraph 1(i) or 6(k) of Schedule 7 (fuel type and fuel mode of a car, van or SPV);
(d) paragraph 1(l) or 6(n) of Schedule 7 (code for any eco-innovations);
(e) paragraph 1(r) or 6(r) of Schedule 7 (electric range of a car, van or SPV, where applicable).
(2) The penalties are—
(a) the financial penalty of—
(i) £7,500;
(ii) £15,000 for each car to which a failure in paragraph (1) relates;
(iii) £15,000 for each ZE SPV of category M1 to which a failure in paragraph (1) relates;
(iv) £18,000 for each van to which a failure in paragraph (1) relates; and
(v) £18,000 for each ZE SPV which is of category N1, or which is of category N2 and which falls within the description in paragraph (c) of the definition in “van” in article 3(1), to which a failure in paragraph (1) relates;
(b) publication; and
(c) a block.
(3) The administrator may impose the penalties in paragraph (4) where a participant in the Trading Schemes fails to comply with a requirement in article 73 to provide, or to ensure that the administrator has available to it, any information other than that specified in paragraph (1).
(4) The penalties are—
(a) the financial penalty of £750; and
(b) publication.
Your change, as a redline
98 Failure to provide information under article 73
(1) The administrator may impose the penalties in paragraph (2) where a participant in the Trading Schemes fails to comply with a requirement in article 73 to provide, or to ensure that the administrator has available to it, the information or evidence specified in—
(a) article 73(5)(a) to (d) (SPVs, car clubs and ZE car or van warranties);
(b) paragraph 1(g), 6(g)12(c) or 13(c) of Schedule 7 (specific emissions of CO2 of a car, van or SPV);
(c) paragraph 1(i) or 6(k) of Schedule 7 (fuel type and fuel mode of a car, van or SPV);
(d) paragraph 1(l) or 6(n) of Schedule 7 (code for any eco-innovations);
(e) paragraph 1(r) or 6(r) of Schedule 7 (electric range of a car, van or SPV, where applicable).
(2) The penalties are—
(a) the financial penalty of—
(i) £7,500;
(ii) £15,000 for each car to which a failure in paragraph (1) relates;
(iii) £15,000 for each ZE SPV of category M1 to which a failure in paragraph (1) relates;
(iv) £18,000 for each van to which a failure in paragraph (1) relates; and
(v) £18,000 for each ZE SPV which is of category N1, or which is of category N2 and which falls within the description in paragraph (c) of the definition in “van” in article 3(1), to which a failure in paragraph (1) relates;
(b) publication; and
(c) a block.
(3) The administrator may impose the penalties in paragraph (4) where a participant in the Trading Schemes fails to comply with a requirement in article 73 to provide, or to ensure that the administrator has available to it, any information other than that specified in paragraph (1).
(4) The penalties are—
(a) the financial penalty of £750; and
(b) publication.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.