Propose a change

Education Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

141G Offence of breach of reporting restrictions

(1) This section applies if a publication includes any matter in breach of section 141F (3). (2) Where the publication is a newspaper or periodical, any proprietor, any editor and any publisher of the newspaper or periodical is guilty of an offence. (3) Where the publication is a programme included in a programme service (within the meaning of the Broadcasting Act 1990), the following are guilty of an offence— (a) any body corporate engaged in providing the programme service in which the programme is included, and (b) any person having functions in relation to the programme corresponding to those of an editor of a newspaper. (4) In the case of any other publication, any person publishing it is guilty of an offence. (5) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale. (6) If an offence committed by a body corporate is proved— (a) to have been committed with the consent or connivance of, or (b) to be attributable to any neglect on the part of, an officer, the officer as well as the body corporate is guilty of the offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. (7) In subsection (6), “officer” means a director, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the body, or a person purporting to act in any such capacity. (8) If the affairs of a body corporate are managed by its members, “director” in subsection (7) means a member of that body. (9) Schedule 11B contains supplementary provision relating to an offence under this section.

Your change, as a redline

141G Offence of breach of reporting restrictions

(1) This section applies if a publication includes any matter in breach of section 141F (3). (2) Where the publication is a newspaper or periodical, any proprietor, any editor and any publisher of the newspaper or periodical is guilty of an offence. (3) Where the publication is a programme included in a programme service (within the meaning of the Broadcasting Act 1990), the following are guilty of an offence— (a) any body corporate engaged in providing the programme service in which the programme is included, and (b) any person having functions in relation to the programme corresponding to those of an editor of a newspaper. (4) In the case of any other publication, any person publishing it is guilty of an offence. (5) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale. (6) If an offence committed by a body corporate is proved— (a) to have been committed with the consent or connivance of, or (b) to be attributable to any neglect on the part of, an officer, the officer as well as the body corporate is guilty of the offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. (7) In subsection (6), “officer” means a director, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the body, or a person purporting to act in any such capacity. (8) If the affairs of a body corporate are managed by its members, “director” in subsection (7) means a member of that body. (9) Schedule 11B contains supplementary provision relating to an offence under this section.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds