Education Act 2002
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
167B Directions under section 167A: appeals
(1) A person in respect of whom a direction has been given under section 167A may appeal to the First-tier Tribunal— (a) against the decision to give the direction; (b) against a decision not to vary or revoke the direction. (2) Regulations may— (a) provide that the Tribunal may not entertain an appeal under this section insofar as the appellant's case is inconsistent with his having been convicted of an offence; (b) prescribe circumstances in which the Tribunal shall allow an appeal under this section; (c) prescribe the powers available to the Tribunal on allowing an appeal under this section.
167B Directions under section 167A: appeals
(1) A person in respect of whom a direction has been given under section 167A may appeal to the First-tier Tribunal— (a) against the decision to give the direction; (b) against a decision not to vary or revoke the direction. (2) Regulations may— (a) provide that the Tribunal may not entertain an appeal under this section insofar as the appellant's case is inconsistent with his having been convicted of an offence; (b) prescribe circumstances in which the Tribunal shall allow an appeal under this section; (c) prescribe the powers available to the Tribunal on allowing an appeal under this section.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.