Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
73 Use of interview statements in prosecution
(1) A statement by X in response to a requirement imposed by virtue of section 72 (a “section 72 statement”) may only be used in evidence against X— (a) on a prosecution for an offence under section 93 or 94; (b) on a prosecution for some other offence in a case falling within subsection (2). (2) A prosecution falls within this subsection if, in the proceedings— (a) in giving evidence, X makes a statement inconsistent with the section 72 statement, and (b) evidence relating to the section 72 statement is adduced, or a question relating to it is asked, by or on behalf of X.
73 Use of interview statements in prosecution
(1) A statement by X in response to a requirement imposed by virtue of section 72 (a “section 72 statement”) may only be used in evidence against X— (a) on a prosecution for an offence under section 93 or 94; (b) on a prosecution for some other offence in a case falling within subsection (2). (2) A prosecution falls within this subsection if, in the proceedings— (a) in giving evidence, X makes a statement inconsistent with the section 72 statement, and (b) evidence relating to the section 72 statement is adduced, or a question relating to it is asked, by or on behalf of X.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.