Propose a change

Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

68C Variation of will or intestacy, etc: identification of settlor

(1) This section applies where— (a) a disposition of property following a person's death is varied, and (b) section 62(6) applies in respect of the variation. (2) Where property becomes settled property in consequence of the variation (and would not, but for the variation, have become settled property), a person mentioned in subsection (3) shall be treated for the purposes of this Act, except where the context otherwise requires— (a) as having made the settlement, and (b) as having provided the property for the purposes of the settlement. (3) Those persons are— (a) a person who immediately before the variation was entitled to the property, or to property from which it derives, absolutely as legatee, (b) a person who would have become entitled to the property, or to property from which it derives, absolutely as legatee but for the variation, (c) a person who immediately before the variation would have been entitled to the property, or to property from which it derives, absolutely as legatee but for being an infant or other person under a disability, and (d) a person who would, but for the variation, have become entitled to the property, or to property from which it derives, absolutely as legatee if he had not been an infant or other person under a disability. (4) In subsection (3) references to a person being entitled to property absolutely as legatee shall be construed in accordance with section 64(3) (reading the references to “an asset” and “any asset” as references to “property”). (5) Where— (a) property would have become comprised in a settlement— (i) which arose on the deceased person's death (whether in accordance with his will, on his intestacy or otherwise), or (ii) which was already in existence on the deceased person's death (whether or not the deceased person was a settlor in relation to that settlement), but (b) in consequence of the variation the property, or property derived from it, becomes comprised in another settlement, the deceased person shall be treated for the purposes of this Act, except where the context otherwise requires, as having made the other settlement. (6) Where— (a) immediately before the variation property is comprised in a settlement and is property of which the deceased person is a settlor, and (b) immediately after the variation the property, or property derived from it, becomes comprised in another settlement, the deceased person shall be treated for the purposes of this Act, except where the context otherwise requires, as having made the other settlement. (7) If a person is treated as having made a settlement under subsection (5) or (6), for the purposes of this Act he shall be treated as having made the settlement immediately before his death. (8) But subsection (7) does not apply in relation to a settlement which arose on the person's death.

Your change, as a redline

68C Variation of will or intestacy, etc: identification of settlor

(1) This section applies where— (a) a disposition of property following a person's death is varied, and (b) section 62(6) applies in respect of the variation. (2) Where property becomes settled property in consequence of the variation (and would not, but for the variation, have become settled property), a person mentioned in subsection (3) shall be treated for the purposes of this Act, except where the context otherwise requires— (a) as having made the settlement, and (b) as having provided the property for the purposes of the settlement. (3) Those persons are— (a) a person who immediately before the variation was entitled to the property, or to property from which it derives, absolutely as legatee, (b) a person who would have become entitled to the property, or to property from which it derives, absolutely as legatee but for the variation, (c) a person who immediately before the variation would have been entitled to the property, or to property from which it derives, absolutely as legatee but for being an infant or other person under a disability, and (d) a person who would, but for the variation, have become entitled to the property, or to property from which it derives, absolutely as legatee if he had not been an infant or other person under a disability. (4) In subsection (3) references to a person being entitled to property absolutely as legatee shall be construed in accordance with section 64(3) (reading the references to “an asset” and “any asset” as references to “property”). (5) Where— (a) property would have become comprised in a settlement— (i) which arose on the deceased person's death (whether in accordance with his will, on his intestacy or otherwise), or (ii) which was already in existence on the deceased person's death (whether or not the deceased person was a settlor in relation to that settlement), but (b) in consequence of the variation the property, or property derived from it, becomes comprised in another settlement, the deceased person shall be treated for the purposes of this Act, except where the context otherwise requires, as having made the other settlement. (6) Where— (a) immediately before the variation property is comprised in a settlement and is property of which the deceased person is a settlor, and (b) immediately after the variation the property, or property derived from it, becomes comprised in another settlement, the deceased person shall be treated for the purposes of this Act, except where the context otherwise requires, as having made the other settlement. (7) If a person is treated as having made a settlement under subsection (5) or (6), for the purposes of this Act he shall be treated as having made the settlement immediately before his death. (8) But subsection (7) does not apply in relation to a settlement which arose on the person's death.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds