Propose a change

The Court Funds (Amendment) Rules 2026

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

4 Amendment to rule 27

For rule 27 (payment under CPR rule 37.3 (payment out of money paid into court)) substitute— Payment under CPR rule 37.3 (payment out of money paid into court) 27 (1) This rule applies where— (a) a payment is to be made to a claimant out of a fund in court under CPR rule 37.3; and (b) the permission of a court is not required for the payment. (2) Subject to rule 28(3), where a defendant has deposited money under a court order or in support of a defence of tender before claim and a CPR Part 36 offer is subsequently accepted, the Accountant General shall make a payment from a fund in court if provided with— (a) where rule 22A(1) does not apply— (i) a written request from the claimant; and (ii) written confirmation from the defendant that all or part of the fund in court may be used to satisfy the offer in whole or in part; or (b) where rule 22A(1) applies— (i) an electronic request from the claimant; and (ii) an electronic copy of the confirmation from the defendant that all or part of the fund in court may be used to satisfy the offer in whole or in part. (3) The Accountant General shall pay any accrued interest remaining in court following a payment under paragraph (2) or rule 28(2) to the defendant. (4) The Accountant General may not make any payment under this rule where more than one defendant is sued jointly and not all of the defendants have deposited money in court unless— (a) the claimant has also discontinued the claim against the defendants who have not deposited money in court; and (b) the Accountant General is provided with a copy, either by post or, where rule 22A(1) applies, by electronic means, of— (i) the notice of discontinuance; and (ii) the written consent to the discontinuance of each of those defendants. .

Your change, as a redline

4 Amendment to rule 27

For rule 27 (payment under CPR rule 37.3 (payment out of money paid into court)) substitute— Payment under CPR rule 37.3 (payment out of money paid into court) 27 (1) This rule applies where— (a) a payment is to be made to a claimant out of a fund in court under CPR rule 37.3; and (b) the permission of a court is not required for the payment. (2) Subject to rule 28(3), where a defendant has deposited money under a court order or in support of a defence of tender before claim and a CPR Part 36 offer is subsequently accepted, the Accountant General shall make a payment from a fund in court if provided with— (a) where rule 22A(1) does not apply— (i) a written request from the claimant; and (ii) written confirmation from the defendant that all or part of the fund in court may be used to satisfy the offer in whole or in part; or (b) where rule 22A(1) applies— (i) an electronic request from the claimant; and (ii) an electronic copy of the confirmation from the defendant that all or part of the fund in court may be used to satisfy the offer in whole or in part. (3) The Accountant General shall pay any accrued interest remaining in court following a payment under paragraph (2) or rule 28(2) to the defendant. (4) The Accountant General may not make any payment under this rule where more than one defendant is sued jointly and not all of the defendants have deposited money in court unless— (a) the claimant has also discontinued the claim against the defendants who have not deposited money in court; and (b) the Accountant General is provided with a copy, either by post or, where rule 22A(1) applies, by electronic means, of— (i) the notice of discontinuance; and (ii) the written consent to the discontinuance of each of those defendants. .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds