Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

14.21 Application to extend a custody time limit

(1) This rule applies where the prosecutor gives notice of application to extend a custody time limit. (2) The court officer must arrange for the court to hear that application as soon as practicable after the expiry of— (a) 5 days from the giving of notice, in the Crown Court; or (b) 2 days from the giving of notice, in a magistrates’ court. (3) The court may shorten a time limit under this rule. [Note. See regulation 7 of the Prosecution of Offences (Custody Time Limits) Regulations 1987. Under regulations 4 and 5 of the 1987 Regulations, unless the court extends the time limit the maximum period during which the defendant may be in pre-trial custody is— (a) in a case which can be tried only in a magistrates’ court, 56 days pending the beginning of the trial; (b) in a magistrates’ court, in a case which can be tried either in that court or in the Crown Court— (i) 70 days, pending the beginning of a trial in the magistrates’ court, or (ii) 56 days, pending the beginning of a trial in the magistrates’ court, if the court decides on such a trial during that period; (c) in the Crown Court, pending the beginning of the trial, 182 days from the sending of the defendant for trial, less any period or periods during which the defendant was in custody in the magistrates’ court. Under section 22(3) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, the court cannot extend a custody time limit which has expired, and must not extend such a time limit unless satisfied— (a) that the need for the extension is due to— (i) the illness or absence of the accused, a necessary witness, a judge or a magistrate, (ii) a postponement which is occasioned by the ordering by the court of separate trials in the case of two or more defendants or two or more offences, or (iii) some other good and sufficient cause; and (b) that the prosecution has acted with all due diligence and expedition.]

Your change, as a redline

14.21 Application to extend a custody time limit

(1) This rule applies where the prosecutor gives notice of application to extend a custody time limit. (2) The court officer must arrange for the court to hear that application as soon as practicable after the expiry of— (a) 5 days from the giving of notice, in the Crown Court; or (b) 2 days from the giving of notice, in a magistrates’ court. (3) The court may shorten a time limit under this rule. [Note. See regulation 7 of the Prosecution of Offences (Custody Time Limits) Regulations 1987. Under regulations 4 and 5 of the 1987 Regulations, unless the court extends the time limit the maximum period during which the defendant may be in pre-trial custody is— (a) in a case which can be tried only in a magistrates’ court, 56 days pending the beginning of the trial; (b) in a magistrates’ court, in a case which can be tried either in that court or in the Crown Court— (i) 70 days, pending the beginning of a trial in the magistrates’ court, or (ii) 56 days, pending the beginning of a trial in the magistrates’ court, if the court decides on such a trial during that period; (c) in the Crown Court, pending the beginning of the trial, 182 days from the sending of the defendant for trial, less any period or periods during which the defendant was in custody in the magistrates’ court. Under section 22(3) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, the court cannot extend a custody time limit which has expired, and must not extend such a time limit unless satisfied— (a) that the need for the extension is due to— (i) the illness or absence of the accused, a necessary witness, a judge or a magistrate, (ii) a postponement which is occasioned by the ordering by the court of separate trials in the case of two or more defendants or two or more offences, or (iii) some other good and sufficient cause; and (b) that the prosecution has acted with all due diligence and expedition.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds