Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

16.4 Written witness statement in evidence

(1) A party who wants to introduce in evidence a written witness statement must— (a) before the hearing at which that party wants to introduce it, serve a copy of the statement on— (i) the court officer, and (ii) each other party; and (b) at or before that hearing, serve on the court officer the statement or an authenticated copy. (2) If that party relies on only part of the statement, that party must mark the copy in such a way as to make that clear. (3) A prosecutor must serve on a defendant, with the copy of the statement, a notice— (a) of the right to object to the introduction of the statement in evidence instead of the witness giving evidence in person; (b) of the time limit for objecting under this rule; and (c) that if the defendant does not object in time, the court— (i) can nonetheless require the witness to give evidence in person, but (ii) may decide not to do so. (4) A party served with a written witness statement who objects to its introduction in evidence must— (a) serve notice of the objection on— (i) the party who served it, and (ii) the court officer; and (b) serve the notice of objection not more than 7 business days after after service of the statement unless— (i) the court extends that time limit, before or after the statement was served, (ii) rule 24.8 (Written guilty plea: special rules) applies, in which case the time limit is the later of 7 business days after service of the statement or 5 business days before the hearing date, or (iii) rule 24.9 (Single justice procedure: special rules) applies, in which case the time limit is 15 business days after service of the statement. (5) The court may exercise its power to require the witness to give evidence in person— (a) on application by any party; or (b) on its own initiative. (6) A party entitled to receive a copy of a statement may waive that entitlement by so informing— (a) the party who would have served it; and (b) the court. [Note. Under section 9(2A) of the Criminal Justice Act 1967, Criminal Procedure Rules may prescribe the period within which a party served with a written witness statement must object to its introduction in evidence, subject to a minimum period of 7 days from its service. Under section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, where a statement in a document is admissible as evidence in criminal proceedings, the statement may be proved by producing either (a) the document, or (b) (whether or not the document exists) a copy of the document or of the material part of it, authenticated in whatever way the court may approve. By section 134 of the 2003 Act, ‘document’ means anything in which information of any description is recorded.]

Your change, as a redline

16.4 Written witness statement in evidence

(1) A party who wants to introduce in evidence a written witness statement must— (a) before the hearing at which that party wants to introduce it, serve a copy of the statement on— (i) the court officer, and (ii) each other party; and (b) at or before that hearing, serve on the court officer the statement or an authenticated copy. (2) If that party relies on only part of the statement, that party must mark the copy in such a way as to make that clear. (3) A prosecutor must serve on a defendant, with the copy of the statement, a notice— (a) of the right to object to the introduction of the statement in evidence instead of the witness giving evidence in person; (b) of the time limit for objecting under this rule; and (c) that if the defendant does not object in time, the court— (i) can nonetheless require the witness to give evidence in person, but (ii) may decide not to do so. (4) A party served with a written witness statement who objects to its introduction in evidence must— (a) serve notice of the objection on— (i) the party who served it, and (ii) the court officer; and (b) serve the notice of objection not more than 7 business days after after service of the statement unless— (i) the court extends that time limit, before or after the statement was served, (ii) rule 24.8 (Written guilty plea: special rules) applies, in which case the time limit is the later of 7 business days after service of the statement or 5 business days before the hearing date, or (iii) rule 24.9 (Single justice procedure: special rules) applies, in which case the time limit is 15 business days after service of the statement. (5) The court may exercise its power to require the witness to give evidence in person— (a) on application by any party; or (b) on its own initiative. (6) A party entitled to receive a copy of a statement may waive that entitlement by so informing— (a) the party who would have served it; and (b) the court. [Note. Under section 9(2A) of the Criminal Justice Act 1967, Criminal Procedure Rules may prescribe the period within which a party served with a written witness statement must object to its introduction in evidence, subject to a minimum period of 7 days from its service. Under section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, where a statement in a document is admissible as evidence in criminal proceedings, the statement may be proved by producing either (a) the document, or (b) (whether or not the document exists) a copy of the document or of the material part of it, authenticated in whatever way the court may approve. By section 134 of the 2003 Act, ‘document’ means anything in which information of any description is recorded.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds