Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

18.13 Representations in response

(1) This rule applies where a party wants to make representations about— (a) an application for a special measures direction; (b) an application for the variation or discharge of such a direction; or (c) a direction, variation or discharge that the court proposes on its own initiative. (2) Such a party must— (a) serve the representations on— (i) the court officer, and (ii) each other party; (b) do so not more than 10 business days after, as applicable— (i) service of the application, or (ii) notice of the direction, variation or discharge that the court proposes; and (c) ask for a hearing, if that party wants one, and explain why it is needed. (3) Where representations include information that the person making them thinks ought not be revealed to another party, that person must— (a) omit that information from the representations served on that other party; (b) mark the information to show that, unless the court otherwise directs, it is only for the court; and (c) with that information include an explanation of why it has been withheld from that other party. (4) Representations against a special measures direction must explain, as appropriate— (a) why the witness is not eligible for assistance; (b) if the witness is eligible for assistance, why— (i) no special measure would be likely to improve the quality of the witness’ evidence, (ii) the proposed measure or measures would not be likely to maximise, so far as practicable, the quality of the witness’ evidence, or (iii) the proposed measure or measures might tend to inhibit the effective testing of that evidence; and (c) in a case in which the admission of video recorded evidence is proposed, why it would not be in the interests of justice for the recording, or part of it, to be admitted as evidence. (5) Representations against the variation or discharge of a special measures direction must explain why it should not be varied or discharged. [Note. Under sections 21 and 22 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, where the witness is a child witness or a qualifying witness the special measures that the court usually must direct must be treated as likely to maximise, so far as practicable, the quality of the witness’ evidence, irrespective of representations to the contrary.]

Your change, as a redline

18.13 Representations in response

(1) This rule applies where a party wants to make representations about— (a) an application for a special measures direction; (b) an application for the variation or discharge of such a direction; or (c) a direction, variation or discharge that the court proposes on its own initiative. (2) Such a party must— (a) serve the representations on— (i) the court officer, and (ii) each other party; (b) do so not more than 10 business days after, as applicable— (i) service of the application, or (ii) notice of the direction, variation or discharge that the court proposes; and (c) ask for a hearing, if that party wants one, and explain why it is needed. (3) Where representations include information that the person making them thinks ought not be revealed to another party, that person must— (a) omit that information from the representations served on that other party; (b) mark the information to show that, unless the court otherwise directs, it is only for the court; and (c) with that information include an explanation of why it has been withheld from that other party. (4) Representations against a special measures direction must explain, as appropriate— (a) why the witness is not eligible for assistance; (b) if the witness is eligible for assistance, why— (i) no special measure would be likely to improve the quality of the witness’ evidence, (ii) the proposed measure or measures would not be likely to maximise, so far as practicable, the quality of the witness’ evidence, or (iii) the proposed measure or measures might tend to inhibit the effective testing of that evidence; and (c) in a case in which the admission of video recorded evidence is proposed, why it would not be in the interests of justice for the recording, or part of it, to be admitted as evidence. (5) Representations against the variation or discharge of a special measures direction must explain why it should not be varied or discharged. [Note. Under sections 21 and 22 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, where the witness is a child witness or a qualifying witness the special measures that the court usually must direct must be treated as likely to maximise, so far as practicable, the quality of the witness’ evidence, irrespective of representations to the contrary.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds