Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

18.22 Intermediary’s duty to the court

(1) This rule applies to an intermediary who accepts— (a) approval by the court for the purposes of section 29 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (Examination of witness through intermediary); (b) approval by the court for the purposes of section 33BA of the 1999 Act (Examination of accused through intermediary); or (c) appointment by the court to facilitate a defendant’s effective participation in the trial, when the defendant gives evidence or at any other time. (2) The intermediary must help the court to achieve the overriding objective— (a) to the best of the intermediary’s skill and understanding by— (i) communicating to the witness or defendant (as the case may be) questions put to them, (ii) communicating to the questioner and the court the replies, and (iii) explaining such questions and answers so that they can be understood; (b) by assessing continually the witness’ or the defendant’s (as the case may be) ability to participate effectively and intervening if necessary; (c) where the intermediary is appointed to facilitate a defendant’s effective participation, by explaining to the defendant, in terms the defendant can understand, what is said and done by the court and other participants; and (d) by actively assisting the court in fulfilling its duties under rule 3.2 (Case management; The duty of the court) and rule 3.9 (Case management; Ground rules hearing), in particular by— (i) complying with directions made by the court, and (ii) at once informing the court of any significant failure (by the intermediary or another) to take any step required by such a direction. (3) This duty overrides any obligation to the witness or to the defendant (as the case may be), or to the person by whom the intermediary is paid.

Your change, as a redline

18.22 Intermediary’s duty to the court

(1) This rule applies to an intermediary who accepts— (a) approval by the court for the purposes of section 29 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (Examination of witness through intermediary); (b) approval by the court for the purposes of section 33BA of the 1999 Act (Examination of accused through intermediary); or (c) appointment by the court to facilitate a defendant’s effective participation in the trial, when the defendant gives evidence or at any other time. (2) The intermediary must help the court to achieve the overriding objective— (a) to the best of the intermediary’s skill and understanding by— (i) communicating to the witness or defendant (as the case may be) questions put to them, (ii) communicating to the questioner and the court the replies, and (iii) explaining such questions and answers so that they can be understood; (b) by assessing continually the witness’ or the defendant’s (as the case may be) ability to participate effectively and intervening if necessary; (c) where the intermediary is appointed to facilitate a defendant’s effective participation, by explaining to the defendant, in terms the defendant can understand, what is said and done by the court and other participants; and (d) by actively assisting the court in fulfilling its duties under rule 3.2 (Case management; The duty of the court) and rule 3.9 (Case management; Ground rules hearing), in particular by— (i) complying with directions made by the court, and (ii) at once informing the court of any significant failure (by the intermediary or another) to take any step required by such a direction. (3) This duty overrides any obligation to the witness or to the defendant (as the case may be), or to the person by whom the intermediary is paid.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds