Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

19.2 Expert’s duty to the court

(1) An expert must help the court to achieve the overriding objective— (a) by giving opinion which is— (i) objective and unbiased, and (ii) within the expert’s area or areas of expertise; and (b) by actively assisting the court in fulfilling its duty of case management under rule 3.2, in particular by— (i) complying with directions made by the court, and (ii) at once informing the court of any significant failure (by the expert or another) to take any step required by such a direction. (2) This duty overrides any obligation to the person from whom the expert receives instructions or by whom the expert is paid. (3) This duty includes obligations— (a) to define the expert’s area or areas of expertise— (i) in the expert’s report, and (ii) when giving evidence in person; (b) when giving evidence in person, to draw the court’s attention to any question to which the answer would be outside the expert’s area or areas of expertise; (c) to inform all parties and the court if the expert’s opinion changes from that contained in a report served as evidence or given in a statement; and (d) to disclose to the party for whom the expert’s evidence is commissioned anything— (i) of which the expert is aware, and (ii) of which that party, if aware of it, would be required to give notice under rule 19.3(3)(c). [Note. The Practice Direction lists examples of matters that should be disclosed under this rule and rule 19.3(3)(c).]

Your change, as a redline

19.2 Expert’s duty to the court

(1) An expert must help the court to achieve the overriding objective— (a) by giving opinion which is— (i) objective and unbiased, and (ii) within the expert’s area or areas of expertise; and (b) by actively assisting the court in fulfilling its duty of case management under rule 3.2, in particular by— (i) complying with directions made by the court, and (ii) at once informing the court of any significant failure (by the expert or another) to take any step required by such a direction. (2) This duty overrides any obligation to the person from whom the expert receives instructions or by whom the expert is paid. (3) This duty includes obligations— (a) to define the expert’s area or areas of expertise— (i) in the expert’s report, and (ii) when giving evidence in person; (b) when giving evidence in person, to draw the court’s attention to any question to which the answer would be outside the expert’s area or areas of expertise; (c) to inform all parties and the court if the expert’s opinion changes from that contained in a report served as evidence or given in a statement; and (d) to disclose to the party for whom the expert’s evidence is commissioned anything— (i) of which the expert is aware, and (ii) of which that party, if aware of it, would be required to give notice under rule 19.3(3)(c). [Note. The Practice Direction lists examples of matters that should be disclosed under this rule and rule 19.3(3)(c).]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds