Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

2.9 Exercise of functions of a District Judge (Magistrates’ Courts) in extradition cases

(1) This rule provides for the exercise by an authorised court officer of relevant judicial functions of a District Judge (Magistrates’ Courts) in a case to which Part 50 (Extradition) applies. (2) Subject to rule 2.4, an authorised court officer who is legally qualified may— (a) fix, cancel or vary the date, time or place for a hearing, including an extradition hearing; and (b) determine an application to extend a time limit set by a rule or by the court, unless the effect would be— (i) to affect the date of any hearing that has been fixed, including an extradition hearing, or (ii) significantly to affect the progress of the case in any other way. (3) An authorised court officer who is not a justices’ legal adviser may not exercise a function of the court in a case in which a District Judge (Magistrates’ Courts) or a justices’ legal adviser so directs. [Note. See also— (a) rule 2.4, which makes general rules about the exercise of judicial functions by authorised court officers; (b) rule 3.6 (Application to vary a direction); and (c) rule 50.4 (Case management in the magistrates’ court and duty of court officer).]

Your change, as a redline

2.9 Exercise of functions of a District Judge (Magistrates’ Courts) in extradition cases

(1) This rule provides for the exercise by an authorised court officer of relevant judicial functions of a District Judge (Magistrates’ Courts) in a case to which Part 50 (Extradition) applies. (2) Subject to rule 2.4, an authorised court officer who is legally qualified may— (a) fix, cancel or vary the date, time or place for a hearing, including an extradition hearing; and (b) determine an application to extend a time limit set by a rule or by the court, unless the effect would be— (i) to affect the date of any hearing that has been fixed, including an extradition hearing, or (ii) significantly to affect the progress of the case in any other way. (3) An authorised court officer who is not a justices’ legal adviser may not exercise a function of the court in a case in which a District Judge (Magistrates’ Courts) or a justices’ legal adviser so directs. [Note. See also— (a) rule 2.4, which makes general rules about the exercise of judicial functions by authorised court officers; (b) rule 3.6 (Application to vary a direction); and (c) rule 50.4 (Case management in the magistrates’ court and duty of court officer).]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds