Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

23.1 When this Part applies

This Part applies where— (a) a defendant may not cross-examine in person a witness because of section 34 or section 35 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (Complainants in proceedings for sexual offences; Child complainants and other child witnesses); or (b) the court can prohibit a defendant from cross-examining in person a witness under section 36 of that Act (Direction prohibiting accused from cross-examining particular witness). [Note. Under section 34 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, no defendant charged with a sexual offence may cross-examine in person a witness who is the complainant, either— (a) in connection with that offence; or (b) in connection with any other offence (of whatever nature) with which that defendant is charged in the proceedings. Under section 35 of the 1999 Act, no defendant charged with an offence listed in that section may cross-examine in person a protected witness, either— (a) in connection with that offence; or (b) in connection with any other offence (of whatever nature) with which that defendant is charged in the proceedings. A ‘protected witness’ is one who— (a) either is the complainant or is alleged to have been a witness to the commission of the offence; and (b) either is a child, within the meaning of section 35, or is due to be cross-examined after giving evidence in chief— (i) by means of a video recording made when the witness was a child, or (ii) in any other way when the witness was a child. Under section 36 of the 1999 Act, where neither section 34 nor section 35 applies the court may give a direction prohibiting the defendant from cross-examining, or further cross-examining, in person a witness, on application by the prosecutor or on the court’s own initiative. See also rules 23.3 to 23.7.]

Your change, as a redline

23.1 When this Part applies

This Part applies where— (a) a defendant may not cross-examine in person a witness because of section 34 or section 35 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (Complainants in proceedings for sexual offences; Child complainants and other child witnesses); or (b) the court can prohibit a defendant from cross-examining in person a witness under section 36 of that Act (Direction prohibiting accused from cross-examining particular witness). [Note. Under section 34 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, no defendant charged with a sexual offence may cross-examine in person a witness who is the complainant, either— (a) in connection with that offence; or (b) in connection with any other offence (of whatever nature) with which that defendant is charged in the proceedings. Under section 35 of the 1999 Act, no defendant charged with an offence listed in that section may cross-examine in person a protected witness, either— (a) in connection with that offence; or (b) in connection with any other offence (of whatever nature) with which that defendant is charged in the proceedings. A ‘protected witness’ is one who— (a) either is the complainant or is alleged to have been a witness to the commission of the offence; and (b) either is a child, within the meaning of section 35, or is due to be cross-examined after giving evidence in chief— (i) by means of a video recording made when the witness was a child, or (ii) in any other way when the witness was a child. Under section 36 of the 1999 Act, where neither section 34 nor section 35 applies the court may give a direction prohibiting the defendant from cross-examining, or further cross-examining, in person a witness, on application by the prosecutor or on the court’s own initiative. See also rules 23.3 to 23.7.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds