Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

23.4 Application to prohibit cross-examination

(1) This rule applies where under section 36 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 the prosecutor wants the court to prohibit the cross-examination of a witness by a defendant in person. (2) The prosecutor must— (a) apply in writing, as soon as reasonably practicable after becoming aware of the grounds for doing so; and (b) serve the application on— (i) the court officer, (ii) the defendant who is the subject of the application, and (iii) any other defendant, unless the court otherwise directs. (3) The application must— (a) report any views that the witness has expressed about whether he or she is content to be cross-examined by the defendant in person; (b) identify— (i) the nature of the questions likely to be asked, having regard to the issues in the case, (ii) any relevant behaviour of the defendant at any stage of the case, generally and in relation to the witness, (iii) any relationship, of any nature, between the witness and the defendant, (iv) any other defendant in the case who is subject to such a prohibition in respect of the witness, and (v) any special measures direction made in respect of the witness, or for which an application has been made; (c) explain why the quality of evidence given by the witness on cross-examination— (i) is likely to be diminished if no such prohibition is imposed, and (ii) would be likely to be improved if it were imposed; and (d) explain why it would not be contrary to the interests of justice to impose the prohibition.

Your change, as a redline

23.4 Application to prohibit cross-examination

(1) This rule applies where under section 36 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 the prosecutor wants the court to prohibit the cross-examination of a witness by a defendant in person. (2) The prosecutor must— (a) apply in writing, as soon as reasonably practicable after becoming aware of the grounds for doing so; and (b) serve the application on— (i) the court officer, (ii) the defendant who is the subject of the application, and (iii) any other defendant, unless the court otherwise directs. (3) The application must— (a) report any views that the witness has expressed about whether he or she is content to be cross-examined by the defendant in person; (b) identify— (i) the nature of the questions likely to be asked, having regard to the issues in the case, (ii) any relevant behaviour of the defendant at any stage of the case, generally and in relation to the witness, (iii) any relationship, of any nature, between the witness and the defendant, (iv) any other defendant in the case who is subject to such a prohibition in respect of the witness, and (v) any special measures direction made in respect of the witness, or for which an application has been made; (c) explain why the quality of evidence given by the witness on cross-examination— (i) is likely to be diminished if no such prohibition is imposed, and (ii) would be likely to be improved if it were imposed; and (d) explain why it would not be contrary to the interests of justice to impose the prohibition.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds