Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

24.12 Procedure where a party is absent

(1) This rule— (a) applies where a party is absent; but (b) does not apply where— (i) the defendant has served a notice of guilty plea under rule 24.8 (Written guilty plea: special rules), or (ii) the court tries a case under rule 24.9 (Single justice procedure: special rules). (2) Where the prosecutor is absent, the court may— (a) if it has received evidence, deal with the case as if the prosecutor were present; and (b) in any other case— (i) enquire into the reasons for the prosecutor’s absence, and (ii) if satisfied there is no good reason, exercise its power to dismiss the allegation. (3) Where the defendant is absent the general rule is that the court must proceed as if the defendant were present and had pleaded not guilty (unless a plea already has been taken), but the general rule— (a) does not apply if the defendant is under 18; (b) is subject to the court being satisfied that— (i) any summons or requisition was served on the defendant a reasonable time before the hearing, or (ii) in a case in which the hearing has been adjourned, the defendant had reasonable notice of where and when it would resume; and (c) is subject to rule 24.11(10)(a) (restrictions on passing sentence in the defendant’s absence). (4) Where the defendant is absent, the court— (a) must exercise its power to issue a warrant for the defendant’s arrest and detention in the terms required by rule 13.3(3) (Terms of a warrant for detention or imprisonment), if it passes a custodial sentence; and (b) may exercise its power to issue a warrant for the defendant’s arrest in any other case, if it does not apply the general rule in paragraph (3) of this rule about proceeding in the defendant’s absence. [Note. See sections 11, 15 and 16 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980. Under section 27 of the 1980 Act, where a magistrates’ court dismisses an allegation of an offence classified as one that can be tried either in a magistrates’ court or in the Crown Court (in other legislation, described as triable either way), that dismissal has the same effect as an acquittal in the Crown Court. Under section 11 of the 1980 Act, the court may pass a custodial sentence in the defendant’s absence if the case started with the defendant’s arrest and charge (and not with a summons or requisition). Section 11(3A) requires that, in that event, the defendant must be brought before the court before being taken to a prison or other institution to begin serving that sentence: see also rule 13.3. Under section 7(1) of the Bail Act 1976, the court has power to issue a warrant for the arrest of a defendant released on bail who has failed to attend court when due to do so. Under section 13 of the 1980 Act, the court has power to issue a warrant for the arrest of an absent defendant, instead of proceeding, where— (1) the case started with— (a) the defendant’s arrest and charge, or (b) a summons or requisition, if— (i) the court is satisfied that that summons or requisition was served on the defendant a reasonable time before the hearing, or (ii) the defendant was present when the hearing was arranged; and (2) the offence is punishable with imprisonment; or (3) the defendant has been convicted and the court considers imposing a disqualification.]

Your change, as a redline

24.12 Procedure where a party is absent

(1) This rule— (a) applies where a party is absent; but (b) does not apply where— (i) the defendant has served a notice of guilty plea under rule 24.8 (Written guilty plea: special rules), or (ii) the court tries a case under rule 24.9 (Single justice procedure: special rules). (2) Where the prosecutor is absent, the court may— (a) if it has received evidence, deal with the case as if the prosecutor were present; and (b) in any other case— (i) enquire into the reasons for the prosecutor’s absence, and (ii) if satisfied there is no good reason, exercise its power to dismiss the allegation. (3) Where the defendant is absent the general rule is that the court must proceed as if the defendant were present and had pleaded not guilty (unless a plea already has been taken), but the general rule— (a) does not apply if the defendant is under 18; (b) is subject to the court being satisfied that— (i) any summons or requisition was served on the defendant a reasonable time before the hearing, or (ii) in a case in which the hearing has been adjourned, the defendant had reasonable notice of where and when it would resume; and (c) is subject to rule 24.11(10)(a) (restrictions on passing sentence in the defendant’s absence). (4) Where the defendant is absent, the court— (a) must exercise its power to issue a warrant for the defendant’s arrest and detention in the terms required by rule 13.3(3) (Terms of a warrant for detention or imprisonment), if it passes a custodial sentence; and (b) may exercise its power to issue a warrant for the defendant’s arrest in any other case, if it does not apply the general rule in paragraph (3) of this rule about proceeding in the defendant’s absence. [Note. See sections 11, 15 and 16 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980. Under section 27 of the 1980 Act, where a magistrates’ court dismisses an allegation of an offence classified as one that can be tried either in a magistrates’ court or in the Crown Court (in other legislation, described as triable either way), that dismissal has the same effect as an acquittal in the Crown Court. Under section 11 of the 1980 Act, the court may pass a custodial sentence in the defendant’s absence if the case started with the defendant’s arrest and charge (and not with a summons or requisition). Section 11(3A) requires that, in that event, the defendant must be brought before the court before being taken to a prison or other institution to begin serving that sentence: see also rule 13.3. Under section 7(1) of the Bail Act 1976, the court has power to issue a warrant for the arrest of a defendant released on bail who has failed to attend court when due to do so. Under section 13 of the 1980 Act, the court has power to issue a warrant for the arrest of an absent defendant, instead of proceeding, where— (1) the case started with— (a) the defendant’s arrest and charge, or (b) a summons or requisition, if— (i) the court is satisfied that that summons or requisition was served on the defendant a reasonable time before the hearing, or (ii) the defendant was present when the hearing was arranged; and (2) the offence is punishable with imprisonment; or (3) the defendant has been convicted and the court considers imposing a disqualification.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds