Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

26.1 Appeal against officer’s refusal to excuse or postpone jury service

(1) This rule applies where a person summoned for jury service in the Crown Court, the High Court or the county court wants to appeal against a refusal by an officer on the Lord Chancellor’s behalf— (a) to excuse that person from such service; or (b) to postpone the date on which that person is required to attend for such service. (2) The appellant must appeal to the court to which the appellant has been summoned. (3) The appellant must— (a) apply in writing, as soon as reasonably practicable; and (b) serve the application on the court officer. (4) The application must— (a) attach a copy of— (i) the jury summons, and (ii) the refusal to excuse or postpone which is under appeal; and (b) explain why the court should excuse the appellant from jury service, or postpone its date, as appropriate. (5) The court to which the appeal is made— (a) may extend the time for appealing, and may allow the appeal to be made orally; (b) may determine the appeal at a hearing in public or in private, or without a hearing; (c) may adjourn any hearing of the appeal; but (d) must not determine an appeal unless the appellant has had a reasonable opportunity to make representations in person. [Note. See sections 9 and 9A of the Juries Act 1974. Where a person summoned for jury service— (a) fails to attend as required; or (b) after attending as required, when selected under rule 25.6— (i) is not available, or (ii) is unfit for jury service by reason of drink or drugs that conduct may be punished as if it were a contempt of court. See section 20 of the Juries Act 1974 and rules 48.5 to 48.8 (contempt of court). The maximum penalty which the court can impose is a fine of £1,000.]

Your change, as a redline

26.1 Appeal against officer’s refusal to excuse or postpone jury service

(1) This rule applies where a person summoned for jury service in the Crown Court, the High Court or the county court wants to appeal against a refusal by an officer on the Lord Chancellor’s behalf— (a) to excuse that person from such service; or (b) to postpone the date on which that person is required to attend for such service. (2) The appellant must appeal to the court to which the appellant has been summoned. (3) The appellant must— (a) apply in writing, as soon as reasonably practicable; and (b) serve the application on the court officer. (4) The application must— (a) attach a copy of— (i) the jury summons, and (ii) the refusal to excuse or postpone which is under appeal; and (b) explain why the court should excuse the appellant from jury service, or postpone its date, as appropriate. (5) The court to which the appeal is made— (a) may extend the time for appealing, and may allow the appeal to be made orally; (b) may determine the appeal at a hearing in public or in private, or without a hearing; (c) may adjourn any hearing of the appeal; but (d) must not determine an appeal unless the appellant has had a reasonable opportunity to make representations in person. [Note. See sections 9 and 9A of the Juries Act 1974. Where a person summoned for jury service— (a) fails to attend as required; or (b) after attending as required, when selected under rule 25.6— (i) is not available, or (ii) is unfit for jury service by reason of drink or drugs that conduct may be punished as if it were a contempt of court. See section 20 of the Juries Act 1974 and rules 48.5 to 48.8 (contempt of court). The maximum penalty which the court can impose is a fine of £1,000.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds