Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

27.2 Application for certificate

(1) This rule applies where― (a) a defendant has been acquitted of an offence; (b) a person has been convicted of one of the following offences involving interference with or intimidation of a juror or a witness (or potential witness) in any proceedings which led to the defendant’s acquittal― (i) perverting the course of justice, (ii) intimidation etc. of witnesses, jurors and others under section 51(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, or (iii) aiding, abetting, counselling, procuring, suborning or inciting another person to commit an offence under section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911; and (c) the prosecutor wants the court by which that person was convicted to certify for the High Court that there is a real possibility that, but for the interference or intimidation, the defendant would not have been acquitted. (2) The prosecutor must— (a) apply in writing as soon as practicable after that person’s conviction; and (b) serve the application on— (i) the court officer, and (ii) the defendant who was acquitted, if the court so directs. (3) The application must— (a) give details, with relevant facts and dates, of— (i) the conviction for interference or intimidation, and (ii) the defendant’s acquittal; and (b) explain— (i) why there is a real possibility that, but for the interference or intimidation, the defendant would not have been acquitted, and (ii) why it would not be contrary to the interests of justice to prosecute the defendant again for the offence of which he or she was acquitted, despite any lapse of time or other reason. (4) The court may— (a) extend the time limit under paragraph (2); (b) allow an application to be in a different form to one issued under the Practice Direction, or to be made orally; and (c) determine an application under this rule— (i) at a hearing, in private or in public; or (ii) without a hearing. (5) If the court gives a certificate, the court officer must serve it on― (a) the prosecutor; and (b) the defendant who was acquitted. [Note: See Section 54 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (Acquittals tainted by intimidation, etc.). For the procedure on application to the High Court, see rules 77.6 to 77.15 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998.]

Your change, as a redline

27.2 Application for certificate

(1) This rule applies where― (a) a defendant has been acquitted of an offence; (b) a person has been convicted of one of the following offences involving interference with or intimidation of a juror or a witness (or potential witness) in any proceedings which led to the defendant’s acquittal― (i) perverting the course of justice, (ii) intimidation etc. of witnesses, jurors and others under section 51(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, or (iii) aiding, abetting, counselling, procuring, suborning or inciting another person to commit an offence under section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911; and (c) the prosecutor wants the court by which that person was convicted to certify for the High Court that there is a real possibility that, but for the interference or intimidation, the defendant would not have been acquitted. (2) The prosecutor must— (a) apply in writing as soon as practicable after that person’s conviction; and (b) serve the application on— (i) the court officer, and (ii) the defendant who was acquitted, if the court so directs. (3) The application must— (a) give details, with relevant facts and dates, of— (i) the conviction for interference or intimidation, and (ii) the defendant’s acquittal; and (b) explain— (i) why there is a real possibility that, but for the interference or intimidation, the defendant would not have been acquitted, and (ii) why it would not be contrary to the interests of justice to prosecute the defendant again for the offence of which he or she was acquitted, despite any lapse of time or other reason. (4) The court may— (a) extend the time limit under paragraph (2); (b) allow an application to be in a different form to one issued under the Practice Direction, or to be made orally; and (c) determine an application under this rule— (i) at a hearing, in private or in public; or (ii) without a hearing. (5) If the court gives a certificate, the court officer must serve it on― (a) the prosecutor; and (b) the defendant who was acquitted. [Note: See Section 54 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (Acquittals tainted by intimidation, etc.). For the procedure on application to the High Court, see rules 77.6 to 77.15 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds