Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

28.1 Reasons for not following usual sentencing requirements

(1) This rule applies where the court decides— (a) not to follow a relevant sentencing guideline; (b) not to make, where it could— (i) a reparation order (unless it passes a custodial or community sentence), (ii) a compensation order, (iii) a slavery and trafficking reparation order, or (iv) a travel restriction order; (c) not to order, where it could— (i) that a suspended sentence of imprisonment is to take effect, (ii) the endorsement of the defendant’s driving record, or (iii) the defendant’s disqualification from driving, for the usual minimum period or at all; or (d) under section 74 or section 388 of the Sentencing Act 2020, to pass a lesser sentence than it otherwise would have passed because the defendant has assisted, or has agreed to assist, an investigator or prosecutor in relation to an offence. (2) The court must explain why it has so decided, when it explains the sentence that it has passed. (3) Where paragraph (1)(d) applies, the court must arrange for such an explanation to be given to the defendant and to the prosecutor in writing, if the court thinks that it would not be in the public interest to explain in public. [Note. See sections 52, 54 and 55 of the Sentencing Act 2020; section 8(7) of the Modern Slavery Act 2015; section 33(2) of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001; paragraph 14(1) of Schedule 16 to the 2020 Act; section 47(1) of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988; and sections 74 and 388 of the 2020 Act. For the duty to explain the sentence the court has passed, seesection 52(1) of the 2020 Act and rules 24.11(9) (procedure where a magistrates’ court convicts) and 25.16(7) (procedure where the Crown Court convicts). Undersection 59 of the 2020 Act, the court when sentencing must follow any relevant sentencing guideline unless satisfied that to do so would be contrary to the interests of justice. For the circumstances in which the court may make— (a) a reparation or compensation order, see sections 110 and 134 of the 2020 Act; (b) a slavery and trafficking reparation order, see section 8 of the 2015 Act; (c) a travel restriction order against a defendant convicted of drug trafficking, see sections 33 and 34 of the 2001 Act.]

Your change, as a redline

28.1 Reasons for not following usual sentencing requirements

(1) This rule applies where the court decides— (a) not to follow a relevant sentencing guideline; (b) not to make, where it could— (i) a reparation order (unless it passes a custodial or community sentence), (ii) a compensation order, (iii) a slavery and trafficking reparation order, or (iv) a travel restriction order; (c) not to order, where it could— (i) that a suspended sentence of imprisonment is to take effect, (ii) the endorsement of the defendant’s driving record, or (iii) the defendant’s disqualification from driving, for the usual minimum period or at all; or (d) under section 74 or section 388 of the Sentencing Act 2020, to pass a lesser sentence than it otherwise would have passed because the defendant has assisted, or has agreed to assist, an investigator or prosecutor in relation to an offence. (2) The court must explain why it has so decided, when it explains the sentence that it has passed. (3) Where paragraph (1)(d) applies, the court must arrange for such an explanation to be given to the defendant and to the prosecutor in writing, if the court thinks that it would not be in the public interest to explain in public. [Note. See sections 52, 54 and 55 of the Sentencing Act 2020; section 8(7) of the Modern Slavery Act 2015; section 33(2) of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001; paragraph 14(1) of Schedule 16 to the 2020 Act; section 47(1) of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988; and sections 74 and 388 of the 2020 Act. For the duty to explain the sentence the court has passed, seesection 52(1) of the 2020 Act and rules 24.11(9) (procedure where a magistrates’ court convicts) and 25.16(7) (procedure where the Crown Court convicts). Undersection 59 of the 2020 Act, the court when sentencing must follow any relevant sentencing guideline unless satisfied that to do so would be contrary to the interests of justice. For the circumstances in which the court may make— (a) a reparation or compensation order, see sections 110 and 134 of the 2020 Act; (b) a slavery and trafficking reparation order, see section 8 of the 2015 Act; (c) a travel restriction order against a defendant convicted of drug trafficking, see sections 33 and 34 of the 2001 Act.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds