Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

29.5 Application for declaration about a course or programme certificate decision

(1) This rule applies where the court can declare unjustified— (a) a course provider’s failure or refusal to give a certificate of the defendant’s satisfactory completion of an approved course; or (b) a programme provider’s giving of a certificate of the defendant’s failure fully to participate in an approved programme. (2) A defendant who wants the court to exercise that power must— (a) apply in writing, not more than 20 business days after— (i) the date by which the defendant was required to complete the course, or (ii) the giving of the certificate of failure fully to participate in the programme; (b) serve the application on the court officer; and (c) in the application, specify the course or programme and explain (as applicable)— (i) that the course provider has failed to give a certificate, (ii) where the course provider has refused to give a certificate, why the defendant disagrees with the reasons for that decision, or (iii) where the programme provider has given a certificate, why the defendant disagrees with the reasons for that decision. (3) The court officer must serve a copy of the application on the course or programme provider. (4) The court must not determine the application unless the defendant, and the course or programme provider, each has had an opportunity to make representations at a hearing (whether or not either in fact attends). [Note. For the circumstances in which the court may reduce a road traffic penalty on condition that the defendant attend an approved course, or take part in an approved programme, see sections 30A, 34A and 34D of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988. Under sections 30B, 34B and 34E of the 1988 Act, the court that made the order, or the defendant’s local magistrates’ court, on application by the defendant may review a course or programme provider’s decision that the defendant has not completed the course satisfactorily, or has not participated fully in the programme.]

Your change, as a redline

29.5 Application for declaration about a course or programme certificate decision

(1) This rule applies where the court can declare unjustified— (a) a course provider’s failure or refusal to give a certificate of the defendant’s satisfactory completion of an approved course; or (b) a programme provider’s giving of a certificate of the defendant’s failure fully to participate in an approved programme. (2) A defendant who wants the court to exercise that power must— (a) apply in writing, not more than 20 business days after— (i) the date by which the defendant was required to complete the course, or (ii) the giving of the certificate of failure fully to participate in the programme; (b) serve the application on the court officer; and (c) in the application, specify the course or programme and explain (as applicable)— (i) that the course provider has failed to give a certificate, (ii) where the course provider has refused to give a certificate, why the defendant disagrees with the reasons for that decision, or (iii) where the programme provider has given a certificate, why the defendant disagrees with the reasons for that decision. (3) The court officer must serve a copy of the application on the course or programme provider. (4) The court must not determine the application unless the defendant, and the course or programme provider, each has had an opportunity to make representations at a hearing (whether or not either in fact attends). [Note. For the circumstances in which the court may reduce a road traffic penalty on condition that the defendant attend an approved course, or take part in an approved programme, see sections 30A, 34A and 34D of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988. Under sections 30B, 34B and 34E of the 1988 Act, the court that made the order, or the defendant’s local magistrates’ court, on application by the defendant may review a course or programme provider’s decision that the defendant has not completed the course satisfactorily, or has not participated fully in the programme.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds