Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

3.23 Application for preparatory hearing

(1) A party who wants the court to order a preparatory hearing must— (a) apply in writing— (i) as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event (ii) not more than 10 business days after the defendant pleads not guilty; and (b) serve the application on— (i) the court officer, and (ii) each other party. (2) The applicant must either— (a) if relevant, explain what legislation requires the court to order a preparatory hearing; or (b) explain— (i) what makes the case complex or serious, or makes the trial likely to be long, (ii) why a substantial benefit will accrue from a preparatory hearing, and (iii) why the court’s ordinary powers of case management are not adequate. (3) A prosecutor who wants the court to order a trial without a jury must explain— (a) where the prosecutor alleges a danger of jury tampering— (i) what evidence there is of a real and present danger that jury tampering would take place, (ii) what steps, if any, reasonably might be taken to prevent jury tampering, and (iii) why, notwithstanding such steps, the likelihood of jury tampering is so substantial as to make it necessary in the interests of justice to order such a trial; or (b) where the prosecutor proposes trial without a jury on some counts on the indictment— (i) why a trial by jury involving all the counts would be impracticable, (ii) how the counts proposed for jury trial can be regarded as samples of the others, and (iii) why it would be in the interests of justice to order such a trial.

Your change, as a redline

3.23 Application for preparatory hearing

(1) A party who wants the court to order a preparatory hearing must— (a) apply in writing— (i) as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event (ii) not more than 10 business days after the defendant pleads not guilty; and (b) serve the application on— (i) the court officer, and (ii) each other party. (2) The applicant must either— (a) if relevant, explain what legislation requires the court to order a preparatory hearing; or (b) explain— (i) what makes the case complex or serious, or makes the trial likely to be long, (ii) why a substantial benefit will accrue from a preparatory hearing, and (iii) why the court’s ordinary powers of case management are not adequate. (3) A prosecutor who wants the court to order a trial without a jury must explain— (a) where the prosecutor alleges a danger of jury tampering— (i) what evidence there is of a real and present danger that jury tampering would take place, (ii) what steps, if any, reasonably might be taken to prevent jury tampering, and (iii) why, notwithstanding such steps, the likelihood of jury tampering is so substantial as to make it necessary in the interests of justice to order such a trial; or (b) where the prosecutor proposes trial without a jury on some counts on the indictment— (i) why a trial by jury involving all the counts would be impracticable, (ii) how the counts proposed for jury trial can be regarded as samples of the others, and (iii) why it would be in the interests of justice to order such a trial.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds