Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

3.24 Application for non-jury trial containing information withheld from a defendant

(1) This rule applies where— (a) the prosecutor applies for an order for a trial without a jury because of a danger of jury tampering; and (b) the application includes information that the prosecutor thinks ought not be revealed to a defendant. (2) The prosecutor must— (a) omit that information from the part of the application that is served on that defendant; (b) mark the other part to show that, unless the court otherwise directs, it is only for the court; and (c) in that other part, explain why the prosecutor has withheld that information from that defendant. (3) The hearing of an application to which this rule applies— (a) must be in private, unless the court otherwise directs; and (b) if the court so directs, may be, wholly or in part, in the absence of a defendant from whom information has been withheld. (4) At the hearing of an application to which this rule applies— (a) the general rule is that the court will receive, in the following sequence— (i) representations first by the prosecutor and then by each defendant, in all the parties’ presence, and then (ii) further representations by the prosecutor, in the absence of a defendant from whom information has been withheld; but (b) the court may direct other arrangements for the hearing. (5) Where, on an application to which this rule applies, the court orders a trial without a jury— (a) the general rule is that the trial will be before a judge other than the judge who made the order; but (b) the court may direct other arrangements.

Your change, as a redline

3.24 Application for non-jury trial containing information withheld from a defendant

(1) This rule applies where— (a) the prosecutor applies for an order for a trial without a jury because of a danger of jury tampering; and (b) the application includes information that the prosecutor thinks ought not be revealed to a defendant. (2) The prosecutor must— (a) omit that information from the part of the application that is served on that defendant; (b) mark the other part to show that, unless the court otherwise directs, it is only for the court; and (c) in that other part, explain why the prosecutor has withheld that information from that defendant. (3) The hearing of an application to which this rule applies— (a) must be in private, unless the court otherwise directs; and (b) if the court so directs, may be, wholly or in part, in the absence of a defendant from whom information has been withheld. (4) At the hearing of an application to which this rule applies— (a) the general rule is that the court will receive, in the following sequence— (i) representations first by the prosecutor and then by each defendant, in all the parties’ presence, and then (ii) further representations by the prosecutor, in the absence of a defendant from whom information has been withheld; but (b) the court may direct other arrangements for the hearing. (5) Where, on an application to which this rule applies, the court orders a trial without a jury— (a) the general rule is that the trial will be before a judge other than the judge who made the order; but (b) the court may direct other arrangements.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds