Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

30.4 Appeal against decision of fines officer

(1) This rule applies where— (a) a collection order is in force; (b) a fines officer makes a decision under one of these paragraphs of Schedule 5 to the Courts Act 2003— (i) paragraph 22 (Application to fines officer for variation of order or attachment of earnings order, etc.), (ii) paragraph 31 (Application to fines officer for variation of reserve terms), or (iii) paragraph 37 (Functions of fines officer in relation to defaulters: referral or further steps notice); and (c) the defendant wants to appeal against that decision. (2) Unless the court otherwise directs, the defendant must— (a) appeal in writing not more than 10 business days after the decision; (b) serve the appeal on the court officer; and (c) in the appeal— (i) explain why a different decision should be made, and (ii) specify the decision that the defendant proposes. (3) Where the court determines an appeal, the general rule is that it must do so at a hearing. [Note. Under paragraph 12 of Schedule 5 to the Courts Act 2003, where a collection order is in force the court’s powers to deal with the defendant’s liability to pay the sum for which that order was made are subject to the provisions of that Schedule and to fines collection regulations. For the circumstances in which a defendant may appeal against a decision to which this rule applies, see paragraphs 23, 32 and 37(9) of Schedule 5 to the 2003 Act. The time limit for appeal is prescribed by those paragraphs. It may be neither extended nor shortened.]

Your change, as a redline

30.4 Appeal against decision of fines officer

(1) This rule applies where— (a) a collection order is in force; (b) a fines officer makes a decision under one of these paragraphs of Schedule 5 to the Courts Act 2003— (i) paragraph 22 (Application to fines officer for variation of order or attachment of earnings order, etc.), (ii) paragraph 31 (Application to fines officer for variation of reserve terms), or (iii) paragraph 37 (Functions of fines officer in relation to defaulters: referral or further steps notice); and (c) the defendant wants to appeal against that decision. (2) Unless the court otherwise directs, the defendant must— (a) appeal in writing not more than 10 business days after the decision; (b) serve the appeal on the court officer; and (c) in the appeal— (i) explain why a different decision should be made, and (ii) specify the decision that the defendant proposes. (3) Where the court determines an appeal, the general rule is that it must do so at a hearing. [Note. Under paragraph 12 of Schedule 5 to the Courts Act 2003, where a collection order is in force the court’s powers to deal with the defendant’s liability to pay the sum for which that order was made are subject to the provisions of that Schedule and to fines collection regulations. For the circumstances in which a defendant may appeal against a decision to which this rule applies, see paragraphs 23, 32 and 37(9) of Schedule 5 to the 2003 Act. The time limit for appeal is prescribed by those paragraphs. It may be neither extended nor shortened.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds