Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

31.11 Bind over: refusal or breach

(1) Where a person to be bound over refuses to enter into a recognisance, the court must— (a) consider such other steps as may be available, for example continuing or starting a prosecution; and (b) treat committal to custody as a last resort. (2) Where a person bound over is alleged to have breached a requirement, before the court forfeits the recognisance it must satisfy itself on the balance of probabilities that a breach has occurred. (3) In addition to paragraph (1) or (2), as applicable, before committing to custody or forfeiting a recognisance the court must follow the procedure required by rule 48.8 (contempt of court by obstruction, disruption, etc.; procedure on enquiry) as if— (a) the refusal or breach were a contempt of court; and (b) the committal or forfeiture were a punishment for such a contempt. [Note. Under section 1(7) of the Justices of the Peace Act 1968 if a person whom the court decides to bind over refuses to enter into a recognisance the court cancommit that person to custody. Payment of the sum due under a recognisance that is forfeit can be enforced under section 58 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980.]

Your change, as a redline

31.11 Bind over: refusal or breach

(1) Where a person to be bound over refuses to enter into a recognisance, the court must— (a) consider such other steps as may be available, for example continuing or starting a prosecution; and (b) treat committal to custody as a last resort. (2) Where a person bound over is alleged to have breached a requirement, before the court forfeits the recognisance it must satisfy itself on the balance of probabilities that a breach has occurred. (3) In addition to paragraph (1) or (2), as applicable, before committing to custody or forfeiting a recognisance the court must follow the procedure required by rule 48.8 (contempt of court by obstruction, disruption, etc.; procedure on enquiry) as if— (a) the refusal or breach were a contempt of court; and (b) the committal or forfeiture were a punishment for such a contempt. [Note. Under section 1(7) of the Justices of the Peace Act 1968 if a person whom the court decides to bind over refuses to enter into a recognisance the court cancommit that person to custody. Payment of the sum due under a recognisance that is forfeit can be enforced under section 58 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds