Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

31.7 Cross-examination of maker of hearsay statement

(1) This rule applies where a party wants the court’s permission to cross-examine a person who made a statement which another party wants to introduce as hearsay. (2) The party who wants to cross-examine that person must— (a) apply in writing, with reasons, not more than 5 business days after service of the notice of hearsay evidence; and (b) serve the application on— (i) the court officer, (ii) the party who served the hearsay evidence notice, and (iii) every party on whom the hearsay evidence notice was served. (3) The court may decide an application under this rule with or without a hearing. (4) But the court must not— (a) dismiss an application under this rule unless the applicant has had an opportunity to make representations at a hearing (whether or not the applicant in fact attends); or (b) allow an application under this rule unless everyone served with the application has had at least 5 business days in which to make representations, including representations about whether there should be a hearing. [Note. See also section 3 of the Civil Evidence Act 1995.]

Your change, as a redline

31.7 Cross-examination of maker of hearsay statement

(1) This rule applies where a party wants the court’s permission to cross-examine a person who made a statement which another party wants to introduce as hearsay. (2) The party who wants to cross-examine that person must— (a) apply in writing, with reasons, not more than 5 business days after service of the notice of hearsay evidence; and (b) serve the application on— (i) the court officer, (ii) the party who served the hearsay evidence notice, and (iii) every party on whom the hearsay evidence notice was served. (3) The court may decide an application under this rule with or without a hearing. (4) But the court must not— (a) dismiss an application under this rule unless the applicant has had an opportunity to make representations at a hearing (whether or not the applicant in fact attends); or (b) allow an application under this rule unless everyone served with the application has had at least 5 business days in which to make representations, including representations about whether there should be a hearing. [Note. See also section 3 of the Civil Evidence Act 1995.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds