Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

33.25 Application for direction about surplus proceeds

(1) This rule applies where— (a) on an application under rule 33.23, a magistrates’ court has made an order authorising the realisation of personal property or requiring the realisation of cryptoassets; (b) an officer holds proceeds of that realisation; (c) the confiscation order has been fully paid; and (d) the officer, or a person who had or has an interest in the property or cryptoassets represented by the proceeds, wants a magistrates’ court or the Crown Court to determine under section 67D of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002— (i) to whom the remaining proceeds should be paid, and (ii) in what amount or amounts. (2) Such a person must— (a) apply in writing; and (b) serve the application on— (i) the court officer, and (ii) as appropriate, the officer holding the proceeds, or any person to whom such proceeds might be paid. (3) The application must— (a) specify the property or cryptoassets realised; (b) explain the applicant’s entitlement to apply; (c) describe the distribution proposed by the applicant and explain why that is proposed; (d) attach any material on which the applicant relies; and (e) ask for a hearing, if the applicant wants one, and explain why it is needed. (4) A person who wants to make representations about the application must— (a) serve the representations on— (i) the court officer, (ii) the applicant, and (iii) any other person to whom proceeds might be paid; (b) do so as soon as reasonably practicable after service of the application; (c) attach any material on which that person relies; and (d) ask for a hearing, if that person wants one, and explain why it is needed. (5) The court— (a) must not determine the application unless the applicant and each person on whom it was served— (i) is present, or (ii) has had an opportunity to attend or to make representations; but (b) subject to that, may determine the application— (i) at a hearing (which must be in private unless the court otherwise directs), or without a hearing, and (ii) in the absence of any party to the application. [Note. Under section 67D of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, a magistrates’ court or the Crown Court may determine to whom, and in what proportions, any surplus proceeds of realisation must be distributed. Once a magistrates’ court has made such a determination, the Crown Court may not do so, and vice versa.]

Your change, as a redline

33.25 Application for direction about surplus proceeds

(1) This rule applies where— (a) on an application under rule 33.23, a magistrates’ court has made an order authorising the realisation of personal property or requiring the realisation of cryptoassets; (b) an officer holds proceeds of that realisation; (c) the confiscation order has been fully paid; and (d) the officer, or a person who had or has an interest in the property or cryptoassets represented by the proceeds, wants a magistrates’ court or the Crown Court to determine under section 67D of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002— (i) to whom the remaining proceeds should be paid, and (ii) in what amount or amounts. (2) Such a person must— (a) apply in writing; and (b) serve the application on— (i) the court officer, and (ii) as appropriate, the officer holding the proceeds, or any person to whom such proceeds might be paid. (3) The application must— (a) specify the property or cryptoassets realised; (b) explain the applicant’s entitlement to apply; (c) describe the distribution proposed by the applicant and explain why that is proposed; (d) attach any material on which the applicant relies; and (e) ask for a hearing, if the applicant wants one, and explain why it is needed. (4) A person who wants to make representations about the application must— (a) serve the representations on— (i) the court officer, (ii) the applicant, and (iii) any other person to whom proceeds might be paid; (b) do so as soon as reasonably practicable after service of the application; (c) attach any material on which that person relies; and (d) ask for a hearing, if that person wants one, and explain why it is needed. (5) The court— (a) must not determine the application unless the applicant and each person on whom it was served— (i) is present, or (ii) has had an opportunity to attend or to make representations; but (b) subject to that, may determine the application— (i) at a hearing (which must be in private unless the court otherwise directs), or without a hearing, and (ii) in the absence of any party to the application. [Note. Under section 67D of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, a magistrates’ court or the Crown Court may determine to whom, and in what proportions, any surplus proceeds of realisation must be distributed. Once a magistrates’ court has made such a determination, the Crown Court may not do so, and vice versa.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds