Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

36.15 Reopening the determination of an appeal

(1) This rule applies where— (a) a party wants the court to reopen a decision which determines an appeal or reference to which this Part applies (including a decision on an application for permission to appeal or refer); or (b) the Registrar refers such a decision to the court for the court to consider reopening it. (2) Such a party must— (a) apply in writing for permission to reopen that decision, as soon as practicable after becoming aware of the grounds for doing so; and (b) serve the application on the Registrar. (3) The application must— (a) specify the decision which the applicant wants the court to reopen; and (b) explain— (i) why it is necessary for the court to reopen that decision in order to avoid real injustice, (ii) how the circumstances are exceptional and make it appropriate to reopen the decision notwithstanding the rights and interests of other participants and the importance of finality, (iii) why there is no alternative effective remedy among any potentially available, and (iv) any delay in making the application. (4) The Registrar— (a) may invite a party’s representations on— (i) an application to reopen a decision, or (ii) a decision that the Registrar has referred, or intends to refer, to the court; and (b) must do so if the court so directs. (5) A party invited to make representations must serve them on the Registrar within such period as the Registrar directs. (6) The court must not reopen a decision to which this rule applies unless each other party has had an opportunity to make representations. [Note. The Court of Appeal has power only in exceptional circumstances to reopen a decision to which this rule applies.]

Your change, as a redline

36.15 Reopening the determination of an appeal

(1) This rule applies where— (a) a party wants the court to reopen a decision which determines an appeal or reference to which this Part applies (including a decision on an application for permission to appeal or refer); or (b) the Registrar refers such a decision to the court for the court to consider reopening it. (2) Such a party must— (a) apply in writing for permission to reopen that decision, as soon as practicable after becoming aware of the grounds for doing so; and (b) serve the application on the Registrar. (3) The application must— (a) specify the decision which the applicant wants the court to reopen; and (b) explain— (i) why it is necessary for the court to reopen that decision in order to avoid real injustice, (ii) how the circumstances are exceptional and make it appropriate to reopen the decision notwithstanding the rights and interests of other participants and the importance of finality, (iii) why there is no alternative effective remedy among any potentially available, and (iv) any delay in making the application. (4) The Registrar— (a) may invite a party’s representations on— (i) an application to reopen a decision, or (ii) a decision that the Registrar has referred, or intends to refer, to the court; and (b) must do so if the court so directs. (5) A party invited to make representations must serve them on the Registrar within such period as the Registrar directs. (6) The court must not reopen a decision to which this rule applies unless each other party has had an opportunity to make representations. [Note. The Court of Appeal has power only in exceptional circumstances to reopen a decision to which this rule applies.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds