Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

36.5 Renewing an application refused by a judge or the Registrar

(1) This rule applies where a party with the right to do so wants to renew— (a) to a judge of the Court of Appeal an application refused by the Registrar; or (b) to the Court of Appeal an application refused by a judge of that court. (2) That party must— (a) renew the application in the form issued under the Practice Direction, signed by or on behalf of the applicant; and (b) serve the renewed application on the Registrar not more than 10 business days after— (i) the refusal of the application that the applicant wants to renew; or (ii) the Registrar serves that refusal on the applicant, if the applicant was not present in person or by live link when the original application was refused. [Note. The time limit of 10 business days under this rule is reduced to 5 business days where Parts 37, 38 or 40 apply: see rules 37.7, 38.10 and 40.7. For the right to renew an application to a judge or to the Court of Appeal, see sections 31(3), 31C and 44 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Mandatory Life Sentences: Appeals in Transitional Cases) Order 2005, the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Appeals under section 74) Order 2006 and the Serious Crime Act 2007 (Appeals under Section 24) Order 2008. A party has no right under section 31C of the 1968 Act to renew to the Court of Appeal an application for procedural directions refused by a judge, but in some circumstances a case management direction might be varied: see rule 3.6. If an applicant does not renew an application that a judge has refused, including an application for permission to appeal, the Registrar will treat it as if it had been refused by the Court of Appeal. Under section 22 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, the Court of Appeal may direct that an appellant who is in custody is to attend a hearing by live link.]

Your change, as a redline

36.5 Renewing an application refused by a judge or the Registrar

(1) This rule applies where a party with the right to do so wants to renew— (a) to a judge of the Court of Appeal an application refused by the Registrar; or (b) to the Court of Appeal an application refused by a judge of that court. (2) That party must— (a) renew the application in the form issued under the Practice Direction, signed by or on behalf of the applicant; and (b) serve the renewed application on the Registrar not more than 10 business days after— (i) the refusal of the application that the applicant wants to renew; or (ii) the Registrar serves that refusal on the applicant, if the applicant was not present in person or by live link when the original application was refused. [Note. The time limit of 10 business days under this rule is reduced to 5 business days where Parts 37, 38 or 40 apply: see rules 37.7, 38.10 and 40.7. For the right to renew an application to a judge or to the Court of Appeal, see sections 31(3), 31C and 44 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Mandatory Life Sentences: Appeals in Transitional Cases) Order 2005, the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Appeals under section 74) Order 2006 and the Serious Crime Act 2007 (Appeals under Section 24) Order 2008. A party has no right under section 31C of the 1968 Act to renew to the Court of Appeal an application for procedural directions refused by a judge, but in some circumstances a case management direction might be varied: see rule 3.6. If an applicant does not renew an application that a judge has refused, including an application for permission to appeal, the Registrar will treat it as if it had been refused by the Court of Appeal. Under section 22 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, the Court of Appeal may direct that an appellant who is in custody is to attend a hearing by live link.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds