Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

36.6 Hearings

(1) The general rule is that the Court of Appeal must hear in public— (a) an application, including an application for permission to appeal; and (b) an appeal or reference, but it may order any hearing to be in private. (2) Where a hearing is about a public interest ruling, that hearing must be in private unless the court otherwise directs. (3) Where the appellant wants to appeal against an order restricting public access to a trial, the court— (a) may decide without a hearing— (i) an application, including an application for permission to appeal, and (ii) an appeal; but (b) must announce its decision on such an appeal at a hearing in public. (4) Where the appellant wants to appeal or to refer a case to the Supreme Court, the court— (a) may decide without a hearing an application— (i) for permission to appeal or to refer a sentencing case, or (ii) to refer a point of law; but (b) must announce its decision on such an application at a hearing in public. (5) Where a party wants the court to reopen the determination of an appeal— (a) the court— (i) must decide the application without a hearing, as a general rule, but (ii) may decide the application at a hearing; and (b) need not announce its decision on such an application at a hearing in public. (6) A judge of the Court of Appeal and the Registrar may exercise any of their powers— (a) at a hearing in public or in private; or (b) without a hearing. [Note. For the procedure on an appeal against an order restricting public access to a trial, see Part 40. For the procedure on an application to reopen the determination of an appeal, see rule 36.15.]

Your change, as a redline

36.6 Hearings

(1) The general rule is that the Court of Appeal must hear in public— (a) an application, including an application for permission to appeal; and (b) an appeal or reference, but it may order any hearing to be in private. (2) Where a hearing is about a public interest ruling, that hearing must be in private unless the court otherwise directs. (3) Where the appellant wants to appeal against an order restricting public access to a trial, the court— (a) may decide without a hearing— (i) an application, including an application for permission to appeal, and (ii) an appeal; but (b) must announce its decision on such an appeal at a hearing in public. (4) Where the appellant wants to appeal or to refer a case to the Supreme Court, the court— (a) may decide without a hearing an application— (i) for permission to appeal or to refer a sentencing case, or (ii) to refer a point of law; but (b) must announce its decision on such an application at a hearing in public. (5) Where a party wants the court to reopen the determination of an appeal— (a) the court— (i) must decide the application without a hearing, as a general rule, but (ii) may decide the application at a hearing; and (b) need not announce its decision on such an application at a hearing in public. (6) A judge of the Court of Appeal and the Registrar may exercise any of their powers— (a) at a hearing in public or in private; or (b) without a hearing. [Note. For the procedure on an appeal against an order restricting public access to a trial, see Part 40. For the procedure on an application to reopen the determination of an appeal, see rule 36.15.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds