Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

39.11 Right to attend hearing

A party who is in custody has a right to attend a hearing in public unless— (a) it is a hearing preliminary or incidental to an appeal, including the hearing of an application for permission to appeal; (b) it is the hearing of an appeal and the court directs that— (i) the appeal involves a question of law alone, and (ii) for that reason the appellant has no permission to attend; or (c) that party is in custody in consequence of— (i) a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity, or (ii) a finding of disability. [Note. See rule 36.6 (Hearings) and section 22 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968. There are corresponding provisions in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Mandatory Life Sentences: Appeals in Transitional Cases) Order 2005, the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Appeals under section 74) Order 2006and the Serious Crime Act 2007 (Appeals under Section 24) Order 2008. Under section 22 of the 1968 Act and corresponding provisions in those Orders, the court may direct that an appellant who is in custody is to attend a hearing by live link.]

Your change, as a redline

39.11 Right to attend hearing

A party who is in custody has a right to attend a hearing in public unless— (a) it is a hearing preliminary or incidental to an appeal, including the hearing of an application for permission to appeal; (b) it is the hearing of an appeal and the court directs that— (i) the appeal involves a question of law alone, and (ii) for that reason the appellant has no permission to attend; or (c) that party is in custody in consequence of— (i) a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity, or (ii) a finding of disability. [Note. See rule 36.6 (Hearings) and section 22 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968. There are corresponding provisions in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Mandatory Life Sentences: Appeals in Transitional Cases) Order 2005, the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Appeals under section 74) Order 2006and the Serious Crime Act 2007 (Appeals under Section 24) Order 2008. Under section 22 of the 1968 Act and corresponding provisions in those Orders, the court may direct that an appellant who is in custody is to attend a hearing by live link.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds