Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

46.4 Application by defendant to change legal representative (legal aid)

(1) An application by a defendant with legal aid to select a new representative in place of the current representative must— (a) explain what the case is about, including what offences are alleged, what stage it has reached and what is likely to be in issue at trial; (b) explain how and why the defendant chose the current representative; (c) if an advocate other than the current representative has been instructed for the defendant, explain whether the defendant wishes to replace that advocate; (d) explain, giving relevant facts and dates— (i) in what way, in the defendant’s opinion, there has been a breakdown in the relationship between the defendant and the current representative such that neither that representative nor any colleague of theirs any longer can provide effective representation, or (ii) what other compelling reason, in the defendant’s opinion, means that neither the current representative nor any such colleague any longer can provide effective representation; (e) give details of any previous application by the defendant to replace a legal representative named in the legal aid representation order; (f) state whether the defendant— (i) waives the legal professional privilege attaching to the defendant’s communications with the current representative, to the extent required to allow that representative to respond to the matters set out in the application, or (ii) declines to waive that privilege and acknowledges that the court may draw such inferences as it thinks fit in consequence; (g) explain how and why the defendant has chosen the proposed new representative; (h) include or attach a statement by the proposed new representative which— (i) confirms that the proposed new representative is eligible and willing to conduct the case for the defendant, (ii) confirms that the proposed new representative can and will meet the current timetable for the case, including any hearing date or dates that have been set, if the application succeeds, (iii) explains what, if any, dealings the proposed new representative has had with the defendant before the present case, (iv) confirms that the proposed new representative has informed the current representative of the defendant’s wish to select a new representative, (v) confirms that the proposed new representative has discussed the defendant’s grounds for the proposed application with the current representative, and (vi) confirms that the proposed new representative has explained to the defendant what it means to waive the legal professional privilege attaching to the defendant’s communications with the current representative and the potential consequences of not doing so; and (i) ask for a hearing, if the defendant wants one, and explain why it is needed. (2) The current representative must— (a) respond in writing no more than 5 business days after service of the application; and (b) serve the response on— (i) the court officer, (ii) the defendant, and (iii) the proposed new representative. (3) The response must— (a) if applicable, explain why the current representative— (i) considers there to be a duty to withdraw from the case in accordance with professional rules of conduct, giving details of the nature of that duty, or (ii) no longer is able to represent the defendant through circumstances outside the representative’s control, giving details of the particular circumstances that render the representative unable to do so; or (b) otherwise— (i) identify those matters, if any, set out in the application with which the current representative disagrees, and (ii) include any comments that the current representative thinks may assist the court.

Your change, as a redline

46.4 Application by defendant to change legal representative (legal aid)

(1) An application by a defendant with legal aid to select a new representative in place of the current representative must— (a) explain what the case is about, including what offences are alleged, what stage it has reached and what is likely to be in issue at trial; (b) explain how and why the defendant chose the current representative; (c) if an advocate other than the current representative has been instructed for the defendant, explain whether the defendant wishes to replace that advocate; (d) explain, giving relevant facts and dates— (i) in what way, in the defendant’s opinion, there has been a breakdown in the relationship between the defendant and the current representative such that neither that representative nor any colleague of theirs any longer can provide effective representation, or (ii) what other compelling reason, in the defendant’s opinion, means that neither the current representative nor any such colleague any longer can provide effective representation; (e) give details of any previous application by the defendant to replace a legal representative named in the legal aid representation order; (f) state whether the defendant— (i) waives the legal professional privilege attaching to the defendant’s communications with the current representative, to the extent required to allow that representative to respond to the matters set out in the application, or (ii) declines to waive that privilege and acknowledges that the court may draw such inferences as it thinks fit in consequence; (g) explain how and why the defendant has chosen the proposed new representative; (h) include or attach a statement by the proposed new representative which— (i) confirms that the proposed new representative is eligible and willing to conduct the case for the defendant, (ii) confirms that the proposed new representative can and will meet the current timetable for the case, including any hearing date or dates that have been set, if the application succeeds, (iii) explains what, if any, dealings the proposed new representative has had with the defendant before the present case, (iv) confirms that the proposed new representative has informed the current representative of the defendant’s wish to select a new representative, (v) confirms that the proposed new representative has discussed the defendant’s grounds for the proposed application with the current representative, and (vi) confirms that the proposed new representative has explained to the defendant what it means to waive the legal professional privilege attaching to the defendant’s communications with the current representative and the potential consequences of not doing so; and (i) ask for a hearing, if the defendant wants one, and explain why it is needed. (2) The current representative must— (a) respond in writing no more than 5 business days after service of the application; and (b) serve the response on— (i) the court officer, (ii) the defendant, and (iii) the proposed new representative. (3) The response must— (a) if applicable, explain why the current representative— (i) considers there to be a duty to withdraw from the case in accordance with professional rules of conduct, giving details of the nature of that duty, or (ii) no longer is able to represent the defendant through circumstances outside the representative’s control, giving details of the particular circumstances that render the representative unable to do so; or (b) otherwise— (i) identify those matters, if any, set out in the application with which the current representative disagrees, and (ii) include any comments that the current representative thinks may assist the court.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds