Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

47.60 Exercise of court’s powers

(1) The court may determine an application to which rule 47.61 (Application for extension of moratorium period) applies— (a) at a hearing (which must be in private unless the court otherwise directs), or without a hearing; and (b) in the absence of— (i) the applicant, and (ii) a respondent. (2) The court must not determine such an application in the applicant’s absence if the applicant asks for a hearing. (3) The court must not determine such an application in the absence of a respondent unless— (a) the absentee has had at least 2 business days in which to make representations; or (b) the court is satisfied that— (i) the applicant cannot identify or contact the absentee, (ii) it would prejudice the investigation if the absentee were present, (iii) it would prejudice the investigation to adjourn or postpone the application so as to allow the absentee to attend, or (iv) the absentee has waived the opportunity to attend. (4) The court officer must arrange for the court to hear such an application no sooner than 2business days after notice of the application was served, unless— (a) the court directs that no hearing need be arranged; or (b) the court gives other directions for the hearing. (5) If the court so directs, the parties to an application may attend a hearing by live link. (6) The court must not extend a moratorium period unless the applicant states, in writing or orally, that to the best of the applicant’s knowledge and belief— (a) the application discloses all the information that is material to what the court must decide; and (b) the content of the application is true. (7) Where the statement required by paragraph (6) is made orally— (a) the statement must be on oath or affirmation, unless the court otherwise directs; and (b) the court must arrange for a record of the making of the statement. (8) The court may— (a) shorten or extend (even after it has expired) a time limit imposed by this rule; (b) dispense with a requirement for service under this Section (even after service was required); and (c) consider an application made orally instead of in writing.

Your change, as a redline

47.60 Exercise of court’s powers

(1) The court may determine an application to which rule 47.61 (Application for extension of moratorium period) applies— (a) at a hearing (which must be in private unless the court otherwise directs), or without a hearing; and (b) in the absence of— (i) the applicant, and (ii) a respondent. (2) The court must not determine such an application in the applicant’s absence if the applicant asks for a hearing. (3) The court must not determine such an application in the absence of a respondent unless— (a) the absentee has had at least 2 business days in which to make representations; or (b) the court is satisfied that— (i) the applicant cannot identify or contact the absentee, (ii) it would prejudice the investigation if the absentee were present, (iii) it would prejudice the investigation to adjourn or postpone the application so as to allow the absentee to attend, or (iv) the absentee has waived the opportunity to attend. (4) The court officer must arrange for the court to hear such an application no sooner than 2business days after notice of the application was served, unless— (a) the court directs that no hearing need be arranged; or (b) the court gives other directions for the hearing. (5) If the court so directs, the parties to an application may attend a hearing by live link. (6) The court must not extend a moratorium period unless the applicant states, in writing or orally, that to the best of the applicant’s knowledge and belief— (a) the application discloses all the information that is material to what the court must decide; and (b) the content of the application is true. (7) Where the statement required by paragraph (6) is made orally— (a) the statement must be on oath or affirmation, unless the court otherwise directs; and (b) the court must arrange for a record of the making of the statement. (8) The court may— (a) shorten or extend (even after it has expired) a time limit imposed by this rule; (b) dispense with a requirement for service under this Section (even after service was required); and (c) consider an application made orally instead of in writing.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds