Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

50.11 Preliminary hearing after provisional arrest

(1) This rule applies where a defendant is first brought before the court after arrest— (a) under a provisional arrest warrant to which rule 50.10 applies; or (b) under section 74A of the Extradition Act 2003, without a warrant. (2) Where paragraph (1)(b) applies the court must first— (a) on the basis of such evidence or information as is produced to the court, decide whether a warrant to which rule 50.10 applies would be issued if the defendant were not already under arrest; and (b) if no such warrant would be issued, order the defendant’s discharge. (3) Unless the court orders the defendant’s discharge under paragraph (2), the court must— (a) explain, in terms the defendant can understand (with help, if necessary)— (i) the allegation in respect of which the defendant has been arrested, and (ii) that the defendant may consent to extradition, and how that may be done and with what effect; and (b) consider any ancillary application, including an application about bail pending receipt of the extradition request. [Note. See sections 74, 74A, 74B, 74C, 74D and 74E of the Extradition Act 2003. Under section 127 of the Act, a defendant’s consent to extradition must be given before the court, must be recorded in writing, and is irrevocable. Consent may not be given unless the defendant has a legal representative with him or her when giving consent, or the defendant has failed or refused to apply for legal aid, or legal aid has been refused or withdrawn.]

Your change, as a redline

50.11 Preliminary hearing after provisional arrest

(1) This rule applies where a defendant is first brought before the court after arrest— (a) under a provisional arrest warrant to which rule 50.10 applies; or (b) under section 74A of the Extradition Act 2003, without a warrant. (2) Where paragraph (1)(b) applies the court must first— (a) on the basis of such evidence or information as is produced to the court, decide whether a warrant to which rule 50.10 applies would be issued if the defendant were not already under arrest; and (b) if no such warrant would be issued, order the defendant’s discharge. (3) Unless the court orders the defendant’s discharge under paragraph (2), the court must— (a) explain, in terms the defendant can understand (with help, if necessary)— (i) the allegation in respect of which the defendant has been arrested, and (ii) that the defendant may consent to extradition, and how that may be done and with what effect; and (b) consider any ancillary application, including an application about bail pending receipt of the extradition request. [Note. See sections 74, 74A, 74B, 74C, 74D and 74E of the Extradition Act 2003. Under section 127 of the Act, a defendant’s consent to extradition must be given before the court, must be recorded in writing, and is irrevocable. Consent may not be given unless the defendant has a legal representative with him or her when giving consent, or the defendant has failed or refused to apply for legal aid, or legal aid has been refused or withdrawn.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds