Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

50.15 Introduction of additional evidence

(1) Where a party wants to introduce evidence at an extradition hearing under the law that would apply if that hearing were a trial, the relevant Part of these Rules applies with such adaptations as the court directs. (2) If the court admits as evidence the written statement of a witness— (a) each relevant part of the statement must be read or summarised aloud; or (b) the court must read the statement and its gist must be summarised aloud. (3) If a party introduces in evidence a fact admitted by another party, or the parties jointly admit a fact, a written record must be made of the admission. [Note. The admissibility of evidence that a party introduces is governed by rules of evidence. Under section 202 of the Extradition Act 2003, the court may receive in evidence— (a) a warrant to which Part 1 of the Act applies; (b) any other document issued in a territory to which Part 1 of the Act applies, if the document is authenticated as required by the Act; (c) a document issued in a territory to which Part 2 of the Act applies, if the document is authenticated as required by the Act. Under sections 84 and 86 of the Act, which apply to evidence, if required, at an extradition hearing to which Part 2 of the Act applies, the court may accept as evidence of a fact a statement by a person in a document if oral evidence by that person of that fact would be admissible, and the statement was made to a police officer, or to someone else responsible for investigating offences or charging offenders. Under section 205 of the Act, section 9 (proof by written witness statement) and section 10 (proof by formal admission) of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 apply to extradition proceedings as they apply in relation to proceedings for an offence.]

Your change, as a redline

50.15 Introduction of additional evidence

(1) Where a party wants to introduce evidence at an extradition hearing under the law that would apply if that hearing were a trial, the relevant Part of these Rules applies with such adaptations as the court directs. (2) If the court admits as evidence the written statement of a witness— (a) each relevant part of the statement must be read or summarised aloud; or (b) the court must read the statement and its gist must be summarised aloud. (3) If a party introduces in evidence a fact admitted by another party, or the parties jointly admit a fact, a written record must be made of the admission. [Note. The admissibility of evidence that a party introduces is governed by rules of evidence. Under section 202 of the Extradition Act 2003, the court may receive in evidence— (a) a warrant to which Part 1 of the Act applies; (b) any other document issued in a territory to which Part 1 of the Act applies, if the document is authenticated as required by the Act; (c) a document issued in a territory to which Part 2 of the Act applies, if the document is authenticated as required by the Act. Under sections 84 and 86 of the Act, which apply to evidence, if required, at an extradition hearing to which Part 2 of the Act applies, the court may accept as evidence of a fact a statement by a person in a document if oral evidence by that person of that fact would be admissible, and the statement was made to a police officer, or to someone else responsible for investigating offences or charging offenders. Under section 205 of the Act, section 9 (proof by written witness statement) and section 10 (proof by formal admission) of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 apply to extradition proceedings as they apply in relation to proceedings for an offence.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds