Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

50.25 Application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court

(1) This rule applies where a party to an appeal to the High Court wants to appeal to the Supreme Court. (2) Such a party must— (a) apply orally to the High Court for permission to appeal immediately after the court’s decision; or (b) apply in writing and serve the application on the High Court officer and every other party not more than 14 days after that decision. (3) Such a party must— (a) identify the point of law of general public importance that the appellant wants the High Court to certify is involved in the decision; (b) serve on the High Court officer a statement of that point of law; and (c) give reasons why— (i) that point of law ought to be considered by the Supreme Court, and (ii) the High Court ought to give permission to appeal. (4) As well as complying with paragraph (3), a defendant’s application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court must include or attach any application for the following, with reasons— (a) bail pending appeal; or (b) permission to attend any hearing in the Supreme Court, if the appellant is in custody. [Note. See sections 32 and 114 of the Extradition Act 2003. Those sections prescribe the time limit for serving an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. It may be neither shortened nor extended.]

Your change, as a redline

50.25 Application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court

(1) This rule applies where a party to an appeal to the High Court wants to appeal to the Supreme Court. (2) Such a party must— (a) apply orally to the High Court for permission to appeal immediately after the court’s decision; or (b) apply in writing and serve the application on the High Court officer and every other party not more than 14 days after that decision. (3) Such a party must— (a) identify the point of law of general public importance that the appellant wants the High Court to certify is involved in the decision; (b) serve on the High Court officer a statement of that point of law; and (c) give reasons why— (i) that point of law ought to be considered by the Supreme Court, and (ii) the High Court ought to give permission to appeal. (4) As well as complying with paragraph (3), a defendant’s application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court must include or attach any application for the following, with reasons— (a) bail pending appeal; or (b) permission to attend any hearing in the Supreme Court, if the appellant is in custody. [Note. See sections 32 and 114 of the Extradition Act 2003. Those sections prescribe the time limit for serving an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. It may be neither shortened nor extended.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds