Propose a change

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

50.9 Preliminary hearing after arrest

(1) This rule applies where a defendant is first brought before the court after arrest under a warrant to which rule 50.8 applies. (2) In the following sequence, the court must— (a) explain, in terms the defendant can understand (with help, if necessary)— (i) the content of the extradition request, and (ii) that the defendant may consent to extradition, and how that may be done and with what effect; (b) arrange for an extradition hearing to begin— (i) no more than 2 months later, or (ii) if either party so applies, at such a later date as the court decides is in the interests of justice; (c) consider any ancillary application, including an application about bail pending the extradition hearing; and (d) give any direction as is appropriate to the needs of the case about the introduction of evidence at the extradition hearing. [Note. See sections 72 and 75 of the Extradition Act 2003. Under section 127 of the 2003 Act a defendant’s consent to extradition must be given before the court, must be recorded in writing, and is irrevocable. Consent may not be given unless the defendant has a legal representative with him or her when giving consent, or the defendant has failed or refused to apply for legal aid, or legal aid has been refused or withdrawn. Part 14 contains rules about bail.]

Your change, as a redline

50.9 Preliminary hearing after arrest

(1) This rule applies where a defendant is first brought before the court after arrest under a warrant to which rule 50.8 applies. (2) In the following sequence, the court must— (a) explain, in terms the defendant can understand (with help, if necessary)— (i) the content of the extradition request, and (ii) that the defendant may consent to extradition, and how that may be done and with what effect; (b) arrange for an extradition hearing to begin— (i) no more than 2 months later, or (ii) if either party so applies, at such a later date as the court decides is in the interests of justice; (c) consider any ancillary application, including an application about bail pending the extradition hearing; and (d) give any direction as is appropriate to the needs of the case about the introduction of evidence at the extradition hearing. [Note. See sections 72 and 75 of the Extradition Act 2003. Under section 127 of the 2003 Act a defendant’s consent to extradition must be given before the court, must be recorded in writing, and is irrevocable. Consent may not be given unless the defendant has a legal representative with him or her when giving consent, or the defendant has failed or refused to apply for legal aid, or legal aid has been refused or withdrawn. Part 14 contains rules about bail.]

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds