Criminal Attempts Act 1981
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE Repeals
Section 10. Part I Repeals Consequential on Part I Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 1 & 2 Geo. 5. c. 6. | Perjury Act 1911. | In section 7(2) the words “or attempts to procure or suborn”. In section 12(2) the words “or with attempting to suborn or procure any other person”. 4 & 5 Eliz. 2. c. 69. | Sexual Offences Act 1956. | In section 40 the words “or of attempting to commit”. 1967 c. 60. | Sexual Offences Act 1967. | In section 8 the words “for attempting to commit either offence”. 1971 c. 38. | Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. | In section 5, subsection (5) and, in subsection (6), the words “or (5)”. In section 19 the words from “to attempt” to “attempt”. In section 25(3) the words from “the attempt” to “may be” and the words “or attempted incitement”. 1973 c. 62. | Powers of Criminal Courts Act 1973. | Section 18(2). 1977 c. 45. | Criminal Law Act 1977. | In section 5(7) the words “and attempt” and “or attempted”. 1980 c. 43. | Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980. | Section 32(1)(c). In Schedule 1, paragraph 34 and in paragraph 35, the words “or 34”. Part II Repeals Consequential on Part II Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 5 Geo. 4. c. 83. | Vagrancy Act 1824. | In section 4 the words from “every suspected person” to “arrestable offence”. 34 & 35 Vict. c. 112. | Prevention of Crimes Act 1871. | Section 15. 54 & 55 Vict. c. 69. | Penal Servitude Act 1891. | Section 7. 1967 c. 58. | Criminal Law Act 1967. | In Schedule 2, in paragraph 2, the words in sub-paragraph (1)(b) from “and in the words” to the end, and sub-paragraph (2). 1968 c. 27. | Firearms Act 1968. | In Schedule 1, paragraph 3.
SCHEDULE Repeals
Section 10. Part I Repeals Consequential on Part I Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 1 & 2 Geo. 5. c. 6. | Perjury Act 1911. | In section 7(2) the words “or attempts to procure or suborn”. In section 12(2) the words “or with attempting to suborn or procure any other person”. 4 & 5 Eliz. 2. c. 69. | Sexual Offences Act 1956. | In section 40 the words “or of attempting to commit”. 1967 c. 60. | Sexual Offences Act 1967. | In section 8 the words “for attempting to commit either offence”. 1971 c. 38. | Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. | In section 5, subsection (5) and, in subsection (6), the words “or (5)”. In section 19 the words from “to attempt” to “attempt”. In section 25(3) the words from “the attempt” to “may be” and the words “or attempted incitement”. 1973 c. 62. | Powers of Criminal Courts Act 1973. | Section 18(2). 1977 c. 45. | Criminal Law Act 1977. | In section 5(7) the words “and attempt” and “or attempted”. 1980 c. 43. | Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980. | Section 32(1)(c). In Schedule 1, paragraph 34 and in paragraph 35, the words “or 34”. Part II Repeals Consequential on Part II Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 5 Geo. 4. c. 83. | Vagrancy Act 1824. | In section 4 the words from “every suspected person” to “arrestable offence”. 34 & 35 Vict. c. 112. | Prevention of Crimes Act 1871. | Section 15. 54 & 55 Vict. c. 69. | Penal Servitude Act 1891. | Section 7. 1967 c. 58. | Criminal Law Act 1967. | In Schedule 2, in paragraph 2, the words in sub-paragraph (1)(b) from “and in the words” to the end, and sub-paragraph (2). 1968 c. 27. | Firearms Act 1968. | In Schedule 1, paragraph 3.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.