Procurement Act 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
19 Award of public contracts following a competitive tendering procedure
(1) A contracting authority may award a public contract to the supplier that submits the most advantageous tender in a competitive tendering procedure. (2) The “most advantageous tender” is the tender that the contracting authority considers— (a) satisfies the contracting authority’s requirements, and (b) best satisfies the award criteria when assessed by reference to— (i) the assessment methodology under section 23(3)(a), and (ii) if there is more than one criterion, the relative importance of the criteria under section 23(3)(b). (3) In assessing tenders for the purposes of this section a contracting authority— (a) must disregard any tender from a supplier that does not satisfy the conditions of participation; (b) may disregard any tender from a supplier that— (i) is not a United Kingdom supplier or treaty state supplier, or (ii) intends to sub-contract the performance of all or part of the contract to a supplier that is not a United Kingdom supplier or treaty state supplier; (c) may disregard any tender that offers a price that the contracting authority considers to be abnormally low for performance of the contract; (d) may disregard any tender which breaches a procedural requirement set out in the tender notice or associated tender documents. (4) Before disregarding a tender under subsection (3)(c) (abnormally low price), a contracting authority must— (a) notify the supplier that the authority considers the price to be abnormally low, and (b) give the supplier reasonable opportunity to demonstrate that it will be able to perform the contract for the price offered. (5) If the supplier demonstrates to the contracting authority’s satisfaction that it will be able to perform the contract for the price offered, the authority may not disregard the tender under subsection (3)(c) (abnormally low price). (6) The reference to a tender breaching a procedural requirement includes a reference to a supplier breaching a procedural requirement in relation to the tender. (7) In this Act, a reference to a contracting authority’s requirements is a reference to requirements described in the tender notice or associated tender documents (see section 21(5) and (6)). (8) See sections 26 and 28 for provision about disregarding tenders from suppliers that are excluded or excludable suppliers or that are sub-contracting to excluded or excludable suppliers. (9) See sections 32 and 33 for provision about reserving public contracts to supported employment providers and qualifying public service mutuals. (10) See section 34 for provision about disregarding tenders from suppliers that are not members of a dynamic market. (11) In this section “procedural requirement” includes a requirement that a supplier provide information.
19 Award of public contracts following a competitive tendering procedure
(1) A contracting authority may award a public contract to the supplier that submits the most advantageous tender in a competitive tendering procedure. (2) The “most advantageous tender” is the tender that the contracting authority considers— (a) satisfies the contracting authority’s requirements, and (b) best satisfies the award criteria when assessed by reference to— (i) the assessment methodology under section 23(3)(a), and (ii) if there is more than one criterion, the relative importance of the criteria under section 23(3)(b). (3) In assessing tenders for the purposes of this section a contracting authority— (a) must disregard any tender from a supplier that does not satisfy the conditions of participation; (b) may disregard any tender from a supplier that— (i) is not a United Kingdom supplier or treaty state supplier, or (ii) intends to sub-contract the performance of all or part of the contract to a supplier that is not a United Kingdom supplier or treaty state supplier; (c) may disregard any tender that offers a price that the contracting authority considers to be abnormally low for performance of the contract; (d) may disregard any tender which breaches a procedural requirement set out in the tender notice or associated tender documents. (4) Before disregarding a tender under subsection (3)(c) (abnormally low price), a contracting authority must— (a) notify the supplier that the authority considers the price to be abnormally low, and (b) give the supplier reasonable opportunity to demonstrate that it will be able to perform the contract for the price offered. (5) If the supplier demonstrates to the contracting authority’s satisfaction that it will be able to perform the contract for the price offered, the authority may not disregard the tender under subsection (3)(c) (abnormally low price). (6) The reference to a tender breaching a procedural requirement includes a reference to a supplier breaching a procedural requirement in relation to the tender. (7) In this Act, a reference to a contracting authority’s requirements is a reference to requirements described in the tender notice or associated tender documents (see section 21(5) and (6)). (8) See sections 26 and 28 for provision about disregarding tenders from suppliers that are excluded or excludable suppliers or that are sub-contracting to excluded or excludable suppliers. (9) See sections 32 and 33 for provision about reserving public contracts to supported employment providers and qualifying public service mutuals. (10) See section 34 for provision about disregarding tenders from suppliers that are not members of a dynamic market. (11) In this section “procedural requirement” includes a requirement that a supplier provide information.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.