Procurement Act 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
20 Competitive tendering procedures
(1) Before awarding a public contract under section 19, a contracting authority must carry out a competitive tendering procedure in accordance with a tender notice and any associated tender documents. (2) A “competitive tendering procedure” is— (a) a single-stage tendering procedure without a restriction on who can submit tenders (an “open procedure”), or (b) such other competitive tendering procedure as the contracting authority considers appropriate for the purpose of awarding the public contract (a “competitive flexible procedure”). (3) A contracting authority must ensure that the procedure is a proportionate means of awarding the public contract, having regard to the nature, complexity and cost of the contract. (4) A competitive flexible procedure— (a) may limit the number of participating suppliers, generally or in respect of particular tendering rounds or other selection processes; (b) may provide for the refinement of award criteria in accordance with section 24; (c) may not permit the participation of suppliers that did not submit a tender in the first round of tendering or that were excluded following an earlier round. (5) A competitive flexible procedure may provide for the exclusion of suppliers— (a) by reference to conditions of participation (see section 22); (b) by reference to an intermediate assessment of tenders; (c) that are not United Kingdom suppliers or treaty state suppliers; (d) that intend to sub-contract the performance of all or part of the contract to a supplier that is not a United Kingdom supplier or treaty state supplier. (6) The reference in subsection (5)(b) to an intermediate assessment of tenders is a reference to an assessment of which tenders— (a) satisfy the contracting authority’s requirements, and (b) best satisfy the award criteria at the point of exclusion, when assessed by reference to— (i) the assessment methodology under section 23(3)(a), and (ii) if there is more than one criterion, the relative importance of the criteria under section 23(3)(b), in each case, at the point of assessment. (7) A competitive tendering procedure may, if a contract is being awarded by reference to lots, limit the number of lots in respect of which any one supplier can submit a tender. (8) See sections 27, 28 and 30 for provision about excluding suppliers that are excluded or excludable suppliers, that are sub-contracting to excluded or excludable suppliers or for improper behaviour. (9) See sections 32 and 33 for provision about reserving public contracts to sheltered employment providers and qualifying mutual societies. (10) See section 34 for provision about excluding suppliers that are not members of a dynamic market.
20 Competitive tendering procedures
(1) Before awarding a public contract under section 19, a contracting authority must carry out a competitive tendering procedure in accordance with a tender notice and any associated tender documents. (2) A “competitive tendering procedure” is— (a) a single-stage tendering procedure without a restriction on who can submit tenders (an “open procedure”), or (b) such other competitive tendering procedure as the contracting authority considers appropriate for the purpose of awarding the public contract (a “competitive flexible procedure”). (3) A contracting authority must ensure that the procedure is a proportionate means of awarding the public contract, having regard to the nature, complexity and cost of the contract. (4) A competitive flexible procedure— (a) may limit the number of participating suppliers, generally or in respect of particular tendering rounds or other selection processes; (b) may provide for the refinement of award criteria in accordance with section 24; (c) may not permit the participation of suppliers that did not submit a tender in the first round of tendering or that were excluded following an earlier round. (5) A competitive flexible procedure may provide for the exclusion of suppliers— (a) by reference to conditions of participation (see section 22); (b) by reference to an intermediate assessment of tenders; (c) that are not United Kingdom suppliers or treaty state suppliers; (d) that intend to sub-contract the performance of all or part of the contract to a supplier that is not a United Kingdom supplier or treaty state supplier. (6) The reference in subsection (5)(b) to an intermediate assessment of tenders is a reference to an assessment of which tenders— (a) satisfy the contracting authority’s requirements, and (b) best satisfy the award criteria at the point of exclusion, when assessed by reference to— (i) the assessment methodology under section 23(3)(a), and (ii) if there is more than one criterion, the relative importance of the criteria under section 23(3)(b), in each case, at the point of assessment. (7) A competitive tendering procedure may, if a contract is being awarded by reference to lots, limit the number of lots in respect of which any one supplier can submit a tender. (8) See sections 27, 28 and 30 for provision about excluding suppliers that are excluded or excludable suppliers, that are sub-contracting to excluded or excludable suppliers or for improper behaviour. (9) See sections 32 and 33 for provision about reserving public contracts to sheltered employment providers and qualifying mutual societies. (10) See section 34 for provision about excluding suppliers that are not members of a dynamic market.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.