The Clergy Conduct Rules 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
89 Review by President of Tribunals of penalty under rule 87
(1) A clerk in Holy Orders on whom a penalty has been imposed in exercise of the power under rule 87(5)(a) may apply to the President of Tribunals for a review of the penalty. (2) On an application for a review under this rule, the President of Tribunals must invite written representations from— (a) the clerk in Holy Orders, (b) the bishop or archbishop who imposed the penalty, and (c) the Investigation and Tribunals Team. (3) Where an application for a review is made under this rule, the implementation of the penalty may be postponed only if the President of Tribunals so orders.
89 Review by President of Tribunals of penalty under rule 87
(1) A clerk in Holy Orders on whom a penalty has been imposed in exercise of the power under rule 87(5)(a) may apply to the President of Tribunals for a review of the penalty. (2) On an application for a review under this rule, the President of Tribunals must invite written representations from— (a) the clerk in Holy Orders, (b) the bishop or archbishop who imposed the penalty, and (c) the Investigation and Tribunals Team. (3) Where an application for a review is made under this rule, the implementation of the penalty may be postponed only if the President of Tribunals so orders.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.