Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
102 Decision
(1) On an appeal under section 101 the Immigration Appeal Tribunal may— (a) affirm the adjudicator’s decision; (b) make any decision which the adjudicator could have made; (c) remit the appeal to an adjudicator; (d) affirm a direction given by the adjudicator under section 87; (e) vary a direction given by the adjudicator under that section; (f) give any direction which the adjudicator could have given under that section. (2) In reaching their decision on an appeal under section 101 the Tribunal may consider evidence about any matter which they think relevant to the adjudicator’s decision, including evidence which concerns a matter arising after the adjudicator’s decision. (3) But where the appeal under section 82 was against refusal of entry clearance or refusal of a certificate of entitlement— (a) subsection (2) shall not apply, and (b) the Tribunal may consider only the circumstances appertaining at the time of the decision to refuse. (4) In remitting an appeal to an adjudicator under subsection (1)(c) the Tribunal may, in particular— (a) require the adjudicator to determine the appeal in accordance with directions of the Tribunal; (b) require the adjudicator to take additional evidence with a view to the appeal being determined by the Tribunal.
102 Decision
(1) On an appeal under section 101 the Immigration Appeal Tribunal may— (a) affirm the adjudicator’s decision; (b) make any decision which the adjudicator could have made; (c) remit the appeal to an adjudicator; (d) affirm a direction given by the adjudicator under section 87; (e) vary a direction given by the adjudicator under that section; (f) give any direction which the adjudicator could have given under that section. (2) In reaching their decision on an appeal under section 101 the Tribunal may consider evidence about any matter which they think relevant to the adjudicator’s decision, including evidence which concerns a matter arising after the adjudicator’s decision. (3) But where the appeal under section 82 was against refusal of entry clearance or refusal of a certificate of entitlement— (a) subsection (2) shall not apply, and (b) the Tribunal may consider only the circumstances appertaining at the time of the decision to refuse. (4) In remitting an appeal to an adjudicator under subsection (1)(c) the Tribunal may, in particular— (a) require the adjudicator to determine the appeal in accordance with directions of the Tribunal; (b) require the adjudicator to take additional evidence with a view to the appeal being determined by the Tribunal.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.