Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
107 Practice directions
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) In the case of proceedings under section 82 ... ..., or proceedings in the Upper Tribunal arising out of such proceedings, practice directions under section 23 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007— (a) may require the Tribunal to treat a specified decision of the Tribunal or UpperTribunalasauthoritative in respect of a particular matter; and (b) may require the Upper Tribunal totreat a specified decision of the Tribunal orUpperTribunal as authoritative in respect of a particular matter. (3A) In subsection (3) the reference to a decision of the Tribunal includes— (a) a decision of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal, and (b) a decision of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
107 Practice directions
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) In the case of proceedings under section 82 ... ..., or proceedings in the Upper Tribunal arising out of such proceedings, practice directions under section 23 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007— (a) may require the Tribunal to treat a specified decision of the Tribunal or UpperTribunalasauthoritative in respect of a particular matter; and (b) may require the Upper Tribunal totreat a specified decision of the Tribunal orUpperTribunal as authoritative in respect of a particular matter. (3A) In subsection (3) the reference to a decision of the Tribunal includes— (a) a decision of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal, and (b) a decision of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.