Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
121 Compliance with procedure
The following shall be inserted after section 31A(3) of the Immigration Act 1971 (procedural requirements for application)—
(3A) Regulations under this section may provide that a failure to comply with a specified requirement of the regulations—
(a) invalidates an application,
(b) does not invalidate an application, or
(c) invalidates an application in specified circumstances (which may be described wholly or partly by reference to action by the applicant, the Secretary of State, an immigration officer or another person).
Your change, as a redline
121 Compliance with procedure
The following shall be inserted after section 31A(3) of the Immigration Act 1971 (procedural requirements for application)—
(3A) Regulations under this section may provide that a failure to comply with a specified requirement of the regulations—
(a) invalidates an application,
(b) does not invalidate an application, or
(c) invalidates an application in specified circumstances (which may be described wholly or partly by reference to action by the applicant, the Secretary of State, an immigration officer or another person).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.