Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
134 Employer
(1) The Secretary of State may require an employer to supply information about an employee whom the Secretary of State reasonably suspects of having committed an offence under—
(a) section 24(A1), (B1), (C1), (D1), (E1) , (E1A) or (1)(b), (c) or (f), 24A(1) or 26(1)(c) or (d) of the Immigration Act 1971 (c. 77) (illegal entry, deception, &c.),
(b) section 105(1)(a), (b) or (c) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 (c. 33) (support for asylum-seeker: fraud), or
(c) section 106(1)(a), (b) or (c) of that Act (support for asylum-seeker: fraud).
(2) The power under subsection (1) may be exercised to require information about an employee only if the information—
(a) is required for the purpose of establishing where the employee is, or
(b) relates to the employee’s earnings or to the history of his employment.
(3) In this section a reference to an employer or employee—
(a) includes a reference to a former employer or employee, and
(b) shall be construed in accordance with section 8(8) of the Asylum and Immigration Act 1996 (c. 49) (restrictions on employment).
(4) Where—
(a) a business (the “employment agency”) arranges for one person (the “worker”) to provide services to another (the “client”), and
(b) the worker is not employed by the employment agency or the client,
this section shall apply as if the employment agency were the worker’s employer while he provides services to the client.
Your change, as a redline
134 Employer
(1) The Secretary of State may require an employer to supply information about an employee whom the Secretary of State reasonably suspects of having committed an offence under—
(a) section 24(A1), (B1), (C1), (D1), (E1) , (E1A) or (1)(b), (c) or (f), 24A(1) or 26(1)(c) or (d) of the Immigration Act 1971 (c. 77) (illegal entry, deception, &c.),
(b) section 105(1)(a), (b) or (c) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 (c. 33) (support for asylum-seeker: fraud), or
(c) section 106(1)(a), (b) or (c) of that Act (support for asylum-seeker: fraud).
(2) The power under subsection (1) may be exercised to require information about an employee only if the information—
(a) is required for the purpose of establishing where the employee is, or
(b) relates to the employee’s earnings or to the history of his employment.
(3) In this section a reference to an employer or employee—
(a) includes a reference to a former employer or employee, and
(b) shall be construed in accordance with section 8(8) of the Asylum and Immigration Act 1996 (c. 49) (restrictions on employment).
(4) Where—
(a) a business (the “employment agency”) arranges for one person (the “worker”) to provide services to another (the “client”), and
(b) the worker is not employed by the employment agency or the client,
this section shall apply as if the employment agency were the worker’s employer while he provides services to the client.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.