High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Act 2021
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
58 Resumption of previous use of land
(1) This section applies where the nominated undertaker discontinues development of land in accordance with deemed planning permission under— (a) section 20(1) or 50(5)(a) of the High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Act 2017, or (b) section 17(1) or 47(3)(a) of this Act. (2) Planning permission is not required for the resumption, at the relevant time, of the use of the land for the purpose for which it was normally used immediately before the land started to be developed in accordance with the deemed planning permission. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2), “the relevant time” is the time when the nominated undertaker discontinues development of the land in accordance with the deemed planning permission. (4) Section 57(2) of TCPA 1990 (which also makes provision disapplying the requirement for planning permission where a previous use is resumed) does not apply in a case where subsection (2) has effect.
58 Resumption of previous use of land
(1) This section applies where the nominated undertaker discontinues development of land in accordance with deemed planning permission under— (a) section 20(1) or 50(5)(a) of the High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Act 2017, or (b) section 17(1) or 47(3)(a) of this Act. (2) Planning permission is not required for the resumption, at the relevant time, of the use of the land for the purpose for which it was normally used immediately before the land started to be developed in accordance with the deemed planning permission. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2), “the relevant time” is the time when the nominated undertaker discontinues development of the land in accordance with the deemed planning permission. (4) Section 57(2) of TCPA 1990 (which also makes provision disapplying the requirement for planning permission where a previous use is resumed) does not apply in a case where subsection (2) has effect.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.