Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
55 Guilty plea by absent accused.
(1) This section applies where, under section 12(5) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 or Article 24(2) of the Magistrates’ Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981, a person is convicted in his absence of an offence under section 29 or 35A and it is appropriately proved that a relevant notice was served on the accused with a summons (2) In subsection (1) “appropriately proved” means— (a) in England and Wales, proved to the satisfaction of the court— (i) on oath, or (ii) in the manner prescribed by Criminal Procedure Rules, and (b) in Northern Ireland, proved to the satisfaction of the court— (i) on oath, (ii) by affidavit, or (iii) in the manner prescribed by magistrates’ courts rules, as defined by Article 2(3) of the Magistrates’ Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981. (2A) This section also applies if— (a) a person is convicted of an offence under section 29 or 35A while being tried in accordance with section 16A of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 (trial by single justice on the papers), and (b) it is proved to the satisfaction of the court, in the manner prescribed by Criminal Procedure Rules, that a relevant notice was served on the accused with the written charge. (3) In this section “relevant notice”, in relation to an accused, means a notice stating that, in the event of his being convicted of the offence, it will be alleged that an order requiring him to pay an amount specified in the notice falls to be made by the court— (a) if the offence is an offence under section 29, under section 30, or (b) if the offence is an offence under section 35A, under section 36. (4) Where this section applies, the court shall proceed under section 30, or section 36, as if the amount specified in the relevant notice were the amount calculated in accordance with that section. (5) Where this section applies by virtue of subsection (1), the court shall not proceed as described in subsection (4) if it is stated in the notification purporting to be given by or on behalf of the accused under— (a) section 12(4) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, or (b) Article 24(2) of the Magistrates’ Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981, that the amount specified in the relevant notice is inappropriate. (6) Where this section applies by virtue of subsection (2A), the court shall not proceed as described in subsection (4) if the written notification served by the accused or the legal representative of the accused in accordance with the single justice procedure notice includes a statement that the amount specified in the relevant notice is inappropriate. (7) In subsection (6) “single justice procedure notice” has the meaning given by section 29 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
55 Guilty plea by absent accused.
(1) This section applies where, under section 12(5) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 or Article 24(2) of the Magistrates’ Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981, a person is convicted in his absence of an offence under section 29 or 35A and it is appropriately proved that a relevant notice was served on the accused with a summons (2) In subsection (1) “appropriately proved” means— (a) in England and Wales, proved to the satisfaction of the court— (i) on oath, or (ii) in the manner prescribed by Criminal Procedure Rules, and (b) in Northern Ireland, proved to the satisfaction of the court— (i) on oath, (ii) by affidavit, or (iii) in the manner prescribed by magistrates’ courts rules, as defined by Article 2(3) of the Magistrates’ Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981. (2A) This section also applies if— (a) a person is convicted of an offence under section 29 or 35A while being tried in accordance with section 16A of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 (trial by single justice on the papers), and (b) it is proved to the satisfaction of the court, in the manner prescribed by Criminal Procedure Rules, that a relevant notice was served on the accused with the written charge. (3) In this section “relevant notice”, in relation to an accused, means a notice stating that, in the event of his being convicted of the offence, it will be alleged that an order requiring him to pay an amount specified in the notice falls to be made by the court— (a) if the offence is an offence under section 29, under section 30, or (b) if the offence is an offence under section 35A, under section 36. (4) Where this section applies, the court shall proceed under section 30, or section 36, as if the amount specified in the relevant notice were the amount calculated in accordance with that section. (5) Where this section applies by virtue of subsection (1), the court shall not proceed as described in subsection (4) if it is stated in the notification purporting to be given by or on behalf of the accused under— (a) section 12(4) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, or (b) Article 24(2) of the Magistrates’ Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981, that the amount specified in the relevant notice is inappropriate. (6) Where this section applies by virtue of subsection (2A), the court shall not proceed as described in subsection (4) if the written notification served by the accused or the legal representative of the accused in accordance with the single justice procedure notice includes a statement that the amount specified in the relevant notice is inappropriate. (7) In subsection (6) “single justice procedure notice” has the meaning given by section 29 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.