Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
90 Cases where consent to disclosure withheld
(1) This section applies where the Chief Inspector—
(a) is determining, for the purpose of deciding whether to grant an application for registration under any of Chapters 2 to 4, whether the prescribed requirements for registration are satisfied and are likely to be continued to be satisfied, or
(b) is determining, for the purpose of deciding whether to cancel the registration of any person under section 68(2)(a) or 69B(2)(a), whether the prescribed requirements for registration have ceased, or will cease, to be satisfied.
(2) The Chief Inspector may, if regulations so provide and he thinks it appropriate to do so, treat the prescribed requirements for registration as not being satisfied or (as the case may be) as having ceased to be satisfied if for the purpose of his determination—
(a) the Chief Inspector has requested a person (“A”) to consent to the disclosure by another person (“B”) to the Chief Inspector of information which—
(i) relates to A,
(ii) is held by B, and
(iii) is of a prescribed description, and
(b) A does not give ... consent or withdraws ... consent after giving it.
Your change, as a redline
90 Cases where consent to disclosure withheld
(1) This section applies where the Chief Inspector—
(a) is determining, for the purpose of deciding whether to grant an application for registration under any of Chapters 2 to 4, whether the prescribed requirements for registration are satisfied and are likely to be continued to be satisfied, or
(b) is determining, for the purpose of deciding whether to cancel the registration of any person under section 68(2)(a) or 69B(2)(a), whether the prescribed requirements for registration have ceased, or will cease, to be satisfied.
(2) The Chief Inspector may, if regulations so provide and he thinks it appropriate to do so, treat the prescribed requirements for registration as not being satisfied or (as the case may be) as having ceased to be satisfied if for the purpose of his determination—
(a) the Chief Inspector has requested a person (“A”) to consent to the disclosure by another person (“B”) to the Chief Inspector of information which—
(i) relates to A,
(ii) is held by B, and
(iii) is of a prescribed description, and
(b) A does not give ... consent or withdraws ... consent after giving it.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.