The A46 Coventry Junctions (Walsgrave) Development Consent Order 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
12 Power to alter layout etc. of streets
(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the undertaker may, for the purposes of constructing and maintaining the authorised development, alter the layout of any street within the Order limits and the layout of any street having a junction with such a street; and, without limitation on the scope of this paragraph, the undertaker may— (a) increase the width of the carriageway of the street by reducing the width of any footpath, footway, cycle track or verge within the street; (b) alter the level or increase the width of any such footpath, footway, cycle track or verge; (c) reduce the width of the carriageway of the street; and (d) make and maintain passing places. (2) The undertaker must restore any street that has been temporarily altered under this article to the reasonable satisfaction of the street authority. (3) The powers conferred by paragraph (1)— (a) are exercisable on the giving of not less than 42 days’ notice to the street authority; and (b) are not to be exercised without the consent of the street authority where that authority is a public authority. (4) If a street authority which receives an application for consent under paragraph (3) fails to notify the undertaker of its decision before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the date on which the application was made, it is deemed to have granted consent. (5) Any application to which this article applies must include a statement that the provisions of paragraph (4) apply to that application. (6) Paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) do not apply where the undertaker is the street authority for a street in which the works are being carried out.
12 Power to alter layout etc. of streets
(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the undertaker may, for the purposes of constructing and maintaining the authorised development, alter the layout of any street within the Order limits and the layout of any street having a junction with such a street; and, without limitation on the scope of this paragraph, the undertaker may— (a) increase the width of the carriageway of the street by reducing the width of any footpath, footway, cycle track or verge within the street; (b) alter the level or increase the width of any such footpath, footway, cycle track or verge; (c) reduce the width of the carriageway of the street; and (d) make and maintain passing places. (2) The undertaker must restore any street that has been temporarily altered under this article to the reasonable satisfaction of the street authority. (3) The powers conferred by paragraph (1)— (a) are exercisable on the giving of not less than 42 days’ notice to the street authority; and (b) are not to be exercised without the consent of the street authority where that authority is a public authority. (4) If a street authority which receives an application for consent under paragraph (3) fails to notify the undertaker of its decision before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the date on which the application was made, it is deemed to have granted consent. (5) Any application to which this article applies must include a statement that the provisions of paragraph (4) apply to that application. (6) Paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) do not apply where the undertaker is the street authority for a street in which the works are being carried out.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.