The A46 Coventry Junctions (Walsgrave) Development Consent Order 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Planning permission
(1) If planning permission is granted under the powers conferred by the 1990 Act for development any part of which is within the Order limits following the coming into force of this Order that is— (a) not itself a nationally significant infrastructure project under the 2008 Act or part of such a project; or (b) required to complete or enable the use or operation of any part of the authorised development, then the carrying out, use or operation of such development under the terms of the planning permission does not constitute a breach of the terms of this Order. (2) Development consent granted by this Order is to be deemed as specific planning permission for the purposes of section 264(3) (cases in which land is not to be treated as operational land for the purposes of that Act) of the 1990 Act. (3) To the extent any development carried out or used pursuant to a planning permission granted under section 57 (requirement of planning permission) of the 1990 Act or compliance with any conditions of that permission is inconsistent with the exercise of any power, right or obligation under this Order or the authorised development— (a) that inconsistency is to be disregarded for the purposes of establishing whether any development which is the subject matter or that planning permission is capable of physical implementation; and (b) in respect of that inconsistency, no enforcement action under the 1990 Act may be taken in relation to development carried out or used pursuant to that planning permission, or compliance with any conditions of that permission, whether inside or outside the Order limits. (4) Any development or any part of a development within the Order limits which is constructed or used under the authority of a permission granted under section 57 of the 1990 Act including permissions falling under sub-paragraph (1) or (3) or otherwise, is deemed not to be a breach of, or inconsistent with, this Order and does not prevent the authorised development being carried out or used or any other power or right under this Order being exercised. (5) Any works carried out under this Order are deemed to be immediately required for the purpose of carrying out development authorised by planning permission granted under the 1990 Act for the purposes of section 9 (requirement of licence for felling) of the Forestry Act 1967. (6) In paragraph (3), “enforcement action” means any enforcing action under Part 7 of the 1990 Act.
6 Planning permission
(1) If planning permission is granted under the powers conferred by the 1990 Act for development any part of which is within the Order limits following the coming into force of this Order that is— (a) not itself a nationally significant infrastructure project under the 2008 Act or part of such a project; or (b) required to complete or enable the use or operation of any part of the authorised development, then the carrying out, use or operation of such development under the terms of the planning permission does not constitute a breach of the terms of this Order. (2) Development consent granted by this Order is to be deemed as specific planning permission for the purposes of section 264(3) (cases in which land is not to be treated as operational land for the purposes of that Act) of the 1990 Act. (3) To the extent any development carried out or used pursuant to a planning permission granted under section 57 (requirement of planning permission) of the 1990 Act or compliance with any conditions of that permission is inconsistent with the exercise of any power, right or obligation under this Order or the authorised development— (a) that inconsistency is to be disregarded for the purposes of establishing whether any development which is the subject matter or that planning permission is capable of physical implementation; and (b) in respect of that inconsistency, no enforcement action under the 1990 Act may be taken in relation to development carried out or used pursuant to that planning permission, or compliance with any conditions of that permission, whether inside or outside the Order limits. (4) Any development or any part of a development within the Order limits which is constructed or used under the authority of a permission granted under section 57 of the 1990 Act including permissions falling under sub-paragraph (1) or (3) or otherwise, is deemed not to be a breach of, or inconsistent with, this Order and does not prevent the authorised development being carried out or used or any other power or right under this Order being exercised. (5) Any works carried out under this Order are deemed to be immediately required for the purpose of carrying out development authorised by planning permission granted under the 1990 Act for the purposes of section 9 (requirement of licence for felling) of the Forestry Act 1967. (6) In paragraph (3), “enforcement action” means any enforcing action under Part 7 of the 1990 Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.