Propose a change

Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

132 Financial limits applying to candidates’ election expenses.

(1) Section 76 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (limitation of election expenses) shall be amended as follows. (2) For subsection (1) there shall be substituted— (1) The election expenses incurred by or on behalf of a candidate at an election must not in the aggregate exceed the maximum amount specified in subsection (2) below or, in the case of any of the Authority elections mentioned in subsection (2A)(a) to (c) below, the maximum amount prescribed by order under that subsection. (3) In subsection (1A) for the words from “subsection” onwards there shall be substituted “ any election expenses incurred by or on behalf of any of those candidates must not in the aggregate exceed the maximum amount prescribed by order under subsection (2A)(d). ” (4) After subsection (1A) there shall be inserted— (1B) Where any election expenses are incurred in excess of a maximum amount specified in subsection (2) above or prescribed by order under subsection (2A) above, any candidate or election agent who— (a) incurred, or authorised the incurring of, the election expenses, and (b) knew or ought reasonably to have known that the expenses would be incurred in excess of that maximum amount, shall be guilty of an illegal practice. (5) In subsection (2), for paragraph (aa) (maximum amount in case of candidate at parliamentary by-election) there shall be substituted— (aa) for a candidate at a parliamentary by-election, £100,000; . (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your change, as a redline

132 Financial limits applying to candidates’ election expenses.

(1) Section 76 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (limitation of election expenses) shall be amended as follows. (2) For subsection (1) there shall be substituted— (1) The election expenses incurred by or on behalf of a candidate at an election must not in the aggregate exceed the maximum amount specified in subsection (2) below or, in the case of any of the Authority elections mentioned in subsection (2A)(a) to (c) below, the maximum amount prescribed by order under that subsection. (3) In subsection (1A) for the words from “subsection” onwards there shall be substituted “ any election expenses incurred by or on behalf of any of those candidates must not in the aggregate exceed the maximum amount prescribed by order under subsection (2A)(d). ” (4) After subsection (1A) there shall be inserted— (1B) Where any election expenses are incurred in excess of a maximum amount specified in subsection (2) above or prescribed by order under subsection (2A) above, any candidate or election agent who— (a) incurred, or authorised the incurring of, the election expenses, and (b) knew or ought reasonably to have known that the expenses would be incurred in excess of that maximum amount, shall be guilty of an illegal practice. (5) In subsection (2), for paragraph (aa) (maximum amount in case of candidate at parliamentary by-election) there shall be substituted— (aa) for a candidate at a parliamentary by-election, £100,000; . (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds